When leadership demands ROI proof before an AI pilot has run, create a simple but compelling business case. Benchmark the exact time and money spent on a current workflow, then present a projected model of the savings after integrating specific AI tools. This tangible forecast makes it easier to secure approval.
Related Insights
Most companies are not Vanguard tech firms. Rather than pursuing speculative, high-failure-rate AI projects, small and medium-sized businesses will see a faster and more reliable ROI by using existing AI tools to automate tedious, routine internal processes.
Generic use cases fail to persuade leadership. To get genuine AI investment, build a custom tool that solves a specific, tangible pain point for an executive. An example is an 'AI board member' trained on past feedback to critique board decks before a meeting, making the value undeniable.
The true ROI of AI lies in reallocating the time and resources saved from automation towards accelerating growth and innovation. Instead of simply cutting staff, companies should use the efficiency gains to pursue new initiatives that increase demand for their products or services.
Moonshot AI overcomes customer skepticism in its AI recommendations by focusing on quantifiable outcomes. Instead of explaining the technology, they demonstrate value by showing clients the direct increase in revenue from the AI's optimizations. Tangible financial results become the ultimate trust-builder.
AI agent platforms are typically priced by usage, not seats, making initial costs low. Instead of a top-down mandate for one tool, leaders should encourage teams to expense and experiment with several options. The best solution for the team will emerge organically through use.
C-suites are more motivated to adopt AI for revenue-generating "front office" activities (like investment analysis) than for cost-saving "back office" automation. The direct, tangible impact on making more money overcomes the organizational inertia that often stalls efficiency-focused technology deployments.
A large-scale Wharton study found 75% of business leaders see positive ROI from AI, directly contradicting a widely-cited but methodologically questionable MIT report claiming 95% of pilots fail. This confirms that despite the hype, businesses are successfully generating tangible value from their AI investments.
Historically, labor costs dwarfed software spending. As AI automates tasks, software budgets will balloon, turning into a primary corporate expense. This forces CFOs to scrutinize software ROI with the same rigor they once applied only to their workforce.
To maximize AI's impact, don't just find isolated use cases for content or demand gen teams. Instead, map a core process like a campaign workflow and apply AI to augment each stage, from strategy and creation to localization and measurement. AI is workflow-native, not function-native.
When leadership pays lip service to AI without committing resources, the root cause is a lack of understanding. Overcome this by empowering a small team to achieve a specific, measurable win (e.g., "we saved 150 hours and generated $1M in new revenue") and presenting it as a concise case study to prove value.
