When your business no longer feels aligned, trust your instincts to make a change. The required pivot may be disruptive and risky, especially if the current model is commercially successful, but your internal wisdom is the most reliable guide for long-term fulfillment and integrity.

Marketing professor Marcus Collins argues that the true test of brand leadership isn't crafting a purpose statement, but adhering to it when faced with challenges or pressure on shareholder value. Many leaders evangelize their brand's point of view only when convenient, which ultimately undermines authenticity.

The directive to 'stay in your lane' is often used to silence dissent. Counter this by expanding your definition of your lane beyond your industry expertise (e.g., marketing) to include your fundamental values (e.g., empowering women). This reframes speaking out as staying true to your authentic mission.

When a founder advises a successor to 'make decisions that energize you,' it's a strategic directive, not a wellness tip. It serves as a guardrail against the 'death by a thousand cuts' that comes from compromising core beliefs just to make others comfortable, thereby preserving the vision.

Bozoma Saint John argues that modern audiences expect corporate leaders to have and express a point of view on important issues. Avoiding a stance to prevent risk is no longer an option. Taking a stand and dealing with potential backlash is now an integral part of an executive's job.

Patagonia avoids performative activism by only speaking out on issues where it has deep-seated authenticity (business and environment) and can be genuinely additive to the conversation. This strategic filter helps them navigate when to engage and when to stay silent.

Activism isn't binary. A 'covert' approach involves expressing values through business decisions like partnerships, hiring, or amplified voices. This is a valid, often safer, alternative to direct 'overt' public statements, allowing for a spectrum of engagement based on comfort and capacity.

A business decision aims to gamify and optimize a specific outcome. A principle decision is based on core values, made without knowing the outcome, to be remembered favorably regardless of the result. Sticking to principles may mean losing a short-term battle but ultimately wins the war by building trust.

The paradox of values-based work is that while it often involves difficult conversations or actions, it ultimately provides energy and fulfillment. Conversely, taking the easy way out (e.g., avoiding conflict) feels simpler in the moment but leaves you feeling hollowed out and depleted.