While the caring economy is often cited as a future source of human jobs, AI's ability to be infinitely patient gives it an "unfair advantage" in roles like medicine and teaching. AI doctors already receive higher ratings for bedside manner, challenging the assumption that these roles are uniquely human.
Related Insights
Beyond displacing current workers, AI will lead to hiring "abatement," where companies proactively eliminate roles from their hiring plans altogether. This is a subtle but profound workforce shift, as entire job categories may vanish from the market before employees can be retrained.
AI's core strength is hyper-sophisticated pattern recognition. If your daily tasks—from filing insurance claims to diagnosing patients—can be broken down into a data set of repeatable patterns, AI can learn to perform them faster and more accurately than a human.
As AI handles complex diagnoses and treatment data, the doctor's primary role will shift to the 'biopsychosocial' aspects of care—navigating family dynamics, patient psychology, and social support for life-and-death decisions that AI cannot replicate.
The common fear of AI eliminating jobs is misguided. In practice, AI automates specific, often administrative, tasks within a role. This allows human workers to offload minutiae and focus on uniquely human skills like relationship building and strategic thinking, ultimately increasing their leverage and value.
As AI automates technical and mundane tasks, the economic value of those skills will decrease. The most critical roles will be leaders with high emotional intelligence whose function is to foster culture and manage the human teams that leverage AI. 'Human skills' will become the new premium in the workforce.
Using the historical parallel of ATMs, CEO Sim Shabalala argues that AI won't eliminate human roles but will automate routine tasks. This frees humans for higher-order work involving empathy, complex problem-solving, and valuable client interaction.
If AI were perfect, it would simply replace tasks. Because it is imperfect and requires nuanced interaction, it creates demand for skilled professionals who can prompt, verify, and creatively apply it. This turns AI's limitations into a tool that requires and rewards human proficiency.
Companies aren't using AI to cut staff but to handle routine tasks, allowing agents to manage complex, emotional issues. This transforms the agent's role from transactional support to high-value relationship management, requiring more empathy and problem-solving skills, not less.
The real inflection point for widespread job displacement will be when businesses decide to hire an AI agent over a human for a full-time role. Current job losses are from human efficiency gains, not agent-based replacement, which is a critical distinction for future workforce planning.
As AI systems become infinitely scalable and more capable, humans will become the weakest link in any cognitive team. The high risk of human error and incorrect conclusions means that, from a purely economic perspective, human cognitive input will eventually detract from, rather than add to, value creation.
