If AI were perfect, it would simply replace tasks. Because it is imperfect and requires nuanced interaction, it creates demand for skilled professionals who can prompt, verify, and creatively apply it. This turns AI's limitations into a tool that requires and rewards human proficiency.
Related Insights
The common fear of AI eliminating jobs is misguided. In practice, AI automates specific, often administrative, tasks within a role. This allows human workers to offload minutiae and focus on uniquely human skills like relationship building and strategic thinking, ultimately increasing their leverage and value.
AI is engineered to eliminate errors, which is precisely its limitation. True human creativity stems from our "bugs"—our quirks, emotions, misinterpretations, and mistakes. This ability to be imperfect is what will continue to separate human ingenuity from artificial intelligence.
AI's ability to generate ideas and initial drafts for a few dollars removes the high cost of entry for new projects. This "ideation" phase, once proven successful, often justifies hiring human experts for full execution, creating net-new work that was previously unaffordable.
Contrary to popular belief, AI reduces inequality of output. Research shows that AI provides the biggest performance lift to lower-skilled workers, bringing their output closer to that of experts. This elevates the value of human judgment over rote implementation, narrowing the performance and wage gap between top and bottom performers.
Instead of fearing job loss, focus on skills in industries with elastic demand. When AI makes workers 10x more productive in these fields (e.g., software), the market will demand 100x more output, increasing the need for skilled humans who can leverage AI.
AI coding assistants won't make fundamental skills obsolete. Instead, they act as a force multiplier that separates engineers. Great engineers use AI to become exceptional by augmenting their deep understanding, while mediocre engineers who rely on it blindly will fall further behind.
As AI commoditizes the 'how' of building products, the most critical human skills become the 'what' and 'why.' Product sense (knowing ingredients for a great product) and product taste (discerning what’s missing) will become far more valuable than process management.
Even powerful AI tools don't produce a final, polished product. This "last mile" problem creates an opportunity for humans who master AI tools and then refine, integrate, and complete the work. These "finisher" roles are indispensable as there is no single AI solution to rule them all.
AI will handle most routine tasks, reducing the number of average 'doers'. Those remaining will be either the absolute best in their craft or individuals leveraging AI for superhuman productivity. Everyone else must shift to 'director' roles, focusing on strategy, orchestration, and interpreting AI output.
As AI makes it incredibly easy to build products, the market will be flooded with options. The critical, differentiating skill will no longer be technical execution but human judgment: deciding *what* should exist, which features matter, and the right distribution strategy. Synthesizing these elements is where future value lies.
