We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Make a large production budget more palatable by reframing the numbers. First, calculate the cost per asset (e.g., "$40k for 20 videos is $2k per video"). Second, emphasize the asset's long shelf life, showing how it will be used for years on homepages, in sales decks, and at events.
To win over executives, quantify the "equivalent value" of your content's organic reach. Frame it as, "We generated 50 million impressions organically, which would have cost the paid media team $X to buy." This reframes content as a compounding, cost-saving investment.
To convince leadership to adopt low-production content, go beyond performance metrics. Frame the argument around business efficiency: highlight the drastically lower budget and the ability to be more timely by reducing production time from months to days. This combination is more compelling than engagement data alone.
To get budget approved, don't ask to "make a video." Instead, identify a specific business problem and pitch the video as the solution. For example, frame it as "We lose deals at stage three because prospects can't explain our value to their boss, so we need an explainer video." This shifts the focus from a cost to an investment.
To get budget approval for upper-funnel channels like TV, avoid positioning it solely as "brand awareness." Instead, frame it as a "performance multiplier" that will improve the efficiency and scale of existing direct response channels, making the investment more palatable to finance teams.
Don't present your product or service as a cost. Instead, use data to frame it as an investment that increases the value of the buyer's existing asset (e.g., a home or business). For example, a $100k pool isn't a cost if data shows it adds $100k+ to the home's resale value.
To get leadership buy-in for less polished content, performance data isn't enough. Heike Young advises presenting a holistic case by including budget data (cost savings) and speed-to-market data (hours to produce vs. weeks). This reframes the decision around efficiency and relevance, not just views.
To justify creative budgets to a CFO, translate creative quality into hard metrics. Strong creative increases demand (lowering CAC), boosts retention (increasing LTV), and reduces the risk of costly cultural backlash (cost avoidance), positioning creativity as a core business growth driver.
To make a high price seem reasonable, anchor it against a different, more expensive component of the customer's total budget that delivers less long-term value. For example, compare a $100k entertainment package to a $300k flower budget, arguing budget should align with memorability.
Instead of presenting one large budget, dissect it into granular categories (digital, events, region, etc.) and sub-categories (regional events vs. analyst events). This shifts the conversation with finance from defending every line item to explaining how different types of investment behave differently and produce different outcomes.
Position marketing as the engine for future quarters' growth, while sales focuses on closing current-quarter deals. This reframes marketing's long-term investments (like brand building) as essential for sustainable revenue, justifying budgets that don't show immediate, direct ROI to a CFO.