NVIDIA sent a private memo to Wall Street analysts refuting accounting criticisms. When the memo leaked, it created a negative public news cycle ('NVIDIA says it's not Enron'), forcing the company into a defensive position and amplifying the skepticism it was trying to discreetly manage.
Related Insights
Michael Burry's thesis is that aggressive stock-based compensation (SBC) at companies like Nvidia significantly distorts their valuations. By treating SBC as a true owner's cost, a stock appearing to trade at 30 times earnings might actually be closer to 60 times, mirroring dot-com era accounting concerns.
Jensen Huang rejects "praise publicly, criticize privately." He criticizes publicly so the entire organization can learn from one person's mistake, optimizing for company-wide learning over individual comfort and avoiding political infighting.
The debate over AI chip depreciation highlights a flaw in traditional accounting. GAAP was designed for physical assets with predictable lifecycles, not for digital infrastructure like GPUs whose value creation is dynamic. This mismatch leads to accusations of financial manipulation where firms are simply following outdated rules.
NVIDIA's polite PR statement regarding Google's competing TPU chips contrasts sharply with the aggressive marketing of modern tech leaders. This 'old school' approach is seen as a weakness, suggesting their marketing 'war muscle' has atrophied from years of unchallenged dominance.
Duolingo CEO's internal memo prioritizing AI over hiring sparked a public backlash. The company then paused its popular social media to cool down, which directly led to a slowdown in daily active user growth. This shows how internal corporate communications, when leaked, can directly damage external consumer-facing metrics.
The high-stakes competition for AI dominance is so intense that investigative journalism can trigger immediate, massive corporate action. A report in The Information about OpenAI exploring Google's TPUs directly prompted NVIDIA's CEO to call OpenAI's CEO and strike a major investment deal to secure the business.
When asked about AI's potential dangers, NVIDIA's CEO consistently reacts with aggressive dismissal. This disproportionate emotional response suggests not just strategic evasion but a deep, personal fear or discomfort with the technology's implications, a stark contrast to his otherwise humble public persona.
Swisher draws a direct parallel between NVIDIA and Cisco. While NVIDIA is profitable selling AI chips, its customers are not. She predicts major tech players will develop their own chips, eroding NVIDIA's unsustainable valuation, just as the market for routers consolidated and crashed Cisco's stock.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's public stance on quantum computing shifted dramatically within months, from a 15-30 year timeline to calling it an 'inflection point' and investing billions. This rapid reversal from a key leader in parallel processing suggests a significant, non-public breakthrough or acceleration is underway in the quantum field.
Jensen Huang counters accusations of inflating revenue by investing in customers. He clarifies the investment in OpenAI is a separate, opportunistic financial bet, while chip sales are driven by market demand and funded independently by OpenAI's own capital raising—not by NVIDIA's investment.
