Reflecting on raising $35M, Ergatta's founder suggests taking less capital might have been wiser. While tempting to raise as much as possible, large funding rounds lock the company into a specific financial trajectory and set of expectations. Raising less money can preserve crucial optionality and flexibility for the business's future.
Related Insights
Raising too much money at a high valuation puts a "bogey on your back." It forces a "shoot the moon" strategy, which can decrease capital efficiency, make future fundraising harder, and limit potential exit opportunities by making the company too expensive for acquirers.
David Cohen observes that founders who are inherently frugal or "stingy" with capital—spending only when absolutely necessary—often achieve better outcomes. This mindset, focused on capital preservation and efficiency, is a more powerful indicator of success than simply raising large rounds to fuel growth, a trait he has seen in his own entrepreneurial career.
Contrary to the celebratory image of fundraising, closing a $5 million seed round did not bring the founder relief. Instead, it amplified his stress and focus, as he immediately felt the weight of the new $40 million valuation and the immense expectations that came with it.
Despite a $50 million exit from their previous company, the Everflow founders intentionally limited their initial investment to a few hundred thousand dollars and didn't take salaries for two years. They believed capital scarcity forces focus and efficiency, preventing wasteful spending while they were still figuring out the product.
Venture capital can create a "treadmill" of raising rounds based on specific metrics, not building a sustainable business. Avoiding VC funding allowed Donald Spann to maintain control, focus on long-term viability, and build a company he could sustain without external pressures or risks.
Chet Pipkin advises that a lack of cash is not always a bad thing for a new venture. Financial constraints force founders to focus on the essential aspects of their business and identify a genuine, pressing customer problem, which is more critical for success than having abundant capital.
A frequent conflict arises between cautious VCs who advise raising excess capital and optimistic founders who underestimate their needs. This misalignment often leads to companies running out of money, a preventable failure mode that veteran VCs have seen repeat for decades, especially when capital is tight.
Accel Events' founder challenges the 'go all in' mantra. He worked a day job for 5 years to bootstrap to $1M ARR. He argues this path, while slower, de-risks the business and proves the concept, allowing founders to hold onto significant ownership instead of raising a large, dilutive seed round early on.
The founder advises against always pursuing the highest valuation, noting it can lead to immense pressure and difficulties in subsequent rounds if the market normalizes. Prioritizing investor chemistry and a fair, responsible valuation is a more sustainable long-term strategy.
Founders mistakenly believe large funding rounds create market pull. Instead, raise minimally to survive until you find a 'wave' or 'dam.' Once demand is so strong you can't keep up with demo requests, then raise a large round to scale operations and capture the opportunity.
