Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

In clinical practice for relapsed large cell lymphoma, glofitumab is a preferred bispecific antibody. Clinicians favor it over epcoritamab because it is time-limited (vs. indefinite treatment) and has a more patient-friendly every-three-week schedule, while also being more active than mosunetuzumab.

Related Insights

When choosing a bispecific antibody for follicular lymphoma, a major practical difference is the treatment duration. Mosunetuzumab is a time-limited therapy stopped after achieving a complete response, while Epcoritamab is given indefinitely until progression. This distinction heavily influences selection, especially for elderly patients.

Provocative data from a German study showed an 81% complete response rate in untreated, elderly DLBCL patients using a chemotherapy-free regimen of polatuzumab (an ADC), glofitamab (a bispecific), and rituximab. This challenges the decades-long R-CHOP chemotherapy backbone and points to a future of targeted frontline therapies.

In follicular lymphoma, the treatment goal is durable remission with manageable toxicity, not necessarily a cure. Therefore, clinicians frequently prefer using a bispecific antibody first, reserving the more complex and toxic CAR-T cell therapy for transformed disease or after a bispecific fails.

Not all CD20-targeting bispecifics can be combined with rituximab. Mosunetuzumab binds the same epitope, causing competition. However, glofitamab and epcoritamab bind different epitopes, allowing for logical and potentially synergistic combinations with rituximab-based regimens.

Experts view R-mini-CHOP, the standard for older/unfit DLBCL patients, as a poor benchmark that urgently needs to be replaced. Promising chemo-free or chemo-light regimens, like the R-Polo-Glofitamab combination, are seen as the future, aiming to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population without harsh toxicities.

To manage infection risk and improve quality of life, experts are quickly reducing bispecific antibody dosing frequency (e.g., to monthly) once a response is achieved. This real-world practice deviates from rigid trial schedules to optimize patient outcomes.

An expert treating DLBCL states they no longer use bispecific antibodies as monotherapy. Combining them with partners like chemotherapy (GemOx) or ADCs (Polatuzumab) raises the complete response rate by 15-20%, offering a better chance of benefit for patients.

Early trial data for single-agent bispecific antibodies in elderly or frail patients with large cell lymphoma reveals surprisingly high efficacy. This success is prompting discussions about a chemotherapy-free future for this population, with combinations like glofitumab-polatuzumab potentially replacing traditional regimens.

In relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma, the bispecific antibody glofitimab is achieving complete remission rates above 75%. This is unprecedented and notably better than existing CAR-T therapy data, suggesting an accessible, off-the-shelf immunotherapy can outperform more complex cellular therapies in this setting.

Long-term follow-up from the pivotal epcoritamab trial reveals that 46% of DLBCL patients who achieve a complete remission maintain it at four years. This durability provides strong evidence that bispecific monotherapy, not just CAR-T, can be a curative treatment for a subset of patients.