Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

While many fear AI-generated books, author Joanna Stern reveals how professionals actually use the technology. AI was not used to write prose but was indispensable for backend tasks like organizing notes, managing timelines, and formatting endnotes, accelerating the entire process.

Related Insights

The "generative" label on AI is misleading. Its true power for daily knowledge work lies not in creating artifacts, but in its superhuman ability to read, comprehend, and synthesize vast amounts of information—a far more frequent and fundamental task than writing.

AI enables rapid book creation by generating chapters and citing sources. This creates a new problem: authors can produce works on complex topics without ever reading the source material or developing deep understanding. This "AI slop" presents a veneer of expertise that lacks the genuine, ingested knowledge of its human creator.

For knowledge workers like authors, up to 50% of their time is spent on tedious "chores" like organizing sources or creating timelines. AI automates this drudgery, freeing up mental bandwidth for higher-value creative tasks like narrative construction and prose.

Joanna Stern describes AI as her "co-founder," not for creative direction, but for handling mundane business setup tasks. This includes planning, research, outreach, and writing contracts, which she estimates AI handles 80% of, making a solo venture more feasible.

The best use of AI in content creation isn't for writing the first draft. Instead, apply it to the tedious parts of the process you dislike, such as data processing, topic ideation, or even editing, to accelerate the path to a high-quality, human-created piece.

The 'generative' AI label is misleading. While its ability to write is powerful, its ability to read, analyze, and synthesize vast amounts of unstructured information is arguably more valuable for day-to-day knowledge work, supporting the critical thinking that precedes artifact creation.

The most effective way to use AI is not for initial research but for synthesis. After you've gathered and vetted high-quality sources, feed them to an AI to identify common themes, find gaps, and pinpoint outliers. This dramatically speeds up analysis without sacrificing quality.

Instead of making AI mimic a human's voice, teams should embrace AI-generated text for internal communications. This is faster for the creator, and the focus shifts to the quality of the underlying thought. The new social contract requires the author to stand by the content, not the prose.

Tech journalist Alex Heath has integrated AI into his workflow, using it to write first drafts which he then edits. This has cut his writing time by 50%, freeing him up to focus on his core competitive advantages: networking with sources, conducting interviews, and breaking stories. It's a model for how knowledge workers can leverage AI.

The most effective way to use AI in creative fields is not as an automaton to generate final products, but as a tireless, hyper-knowledgeable writing partner. The human provides taste and direction, guiding the AI through back-and-forth exchanges to refine ideas and overcome creative blocks.