With information now ubiquitous, the primary source of market inefficiency is no longer informational but behavioral. The most durable edge is "time arbitrage"—exploiting the market's obsession with short-term results by focusing on a business's normalized potential over a two-to-four-year horizon.

Permira's co-CEO highlights a critical challenge in industries with long feedback loops, like private equity: the temptation to prematurely kill initiatives that appear to be failing. The key leadership skill is discerning if a strategy is flawed or simply needs more time to compound.

While long-term focus is a virtue, investment managers at WCM warn it can become an excuse for inaction. During periods of significant market change, blindly "sticking to your knitting" is a liability. Recognizing when to sensibly adapt versus when to stay the course is a critical and nuanced skill.

Judging investment skill requires observing performance through both bull and bear markets. A fixed period, like 5 or 10 years, can be misleading if it only captures one type of environment, often rewarding mere risk tolerance rather than genuine ability.

Simply "thinking long-term" is not enough. A genuine long-term approach requires three aligned components: 1) a long-term perspective, 2) an investment structure (like an open-ended fund) that doesn't force short-term decisions, and 3) a clear understanding of what "long-term" means (10 years vs. 50 years).

Investors often judge investments over three to five years, a statistically meaningless timeframe. Academic research suggests it requires approximately 64 years of performance data to know with confidence whether an active manager's outperformance is due to genuine skill (alpha) or simply luck, highlighting the folly of short-term evaluation.

By extending your investment time horizon to seven years, as Jeff Bezos advocated, you compete against a fraction of the market participants who focus on shorter cycles. This long-term perspective allows you to pursue opportunities that others are structurally unable to, creating a significant competitive advantage.

Alan Waxman argues that the rapid pace of global change means investment themes are no longer multi-year theses. He believes a theme's shelf life is now just 12 to 36 months, demanding a flexible, multi-strategy approach to constantly migrate capital to the best risk-reward opportunities rather than staying in one vertical.

While institutional money managers operate on an average six-month timeframe, individual investors can gain a significant advantage by adopting a minimum three-year outlook. This long-term perspective allows one to endure volatility that forces short-term players to sell, capturing the full compounding potential of great companies.