Success at the leadership level requires a developed tolerance for pressure and uncertainty—a skill the CEO calls a 'stomach' for it. This resilience is a distinct capability, and its absence can cause even the most intelligent and talented individuals to fail under pressure, making it a crucial trait for high-stakes roles.

Related Insights

Daring leadership isn't measured by how much personal information you disclose. It's the learnable capacity to remain present and effective during moments of uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure. Some of the most vulnerable leaders share very little personally.

Product management is inherently chaotic due to constant context switching, ambiguity, and difficult stakeholder conversations. Success isn't about finding a perfect process, but developing the resilience to navigate this mess and guide teams from ambiguity to clarity.

The best leaders act on incomplete information, understanding that 100% certainty is a myth that only exists in hindsight. The inability to decide amid ambiguity—choosing inaction—is a greater failure than making the wrong call.

The essence of the entrepreneurial journey is the ability to tolerate immense uncertainty and fear over long periods. It involves working for months or years with little visible progress, making high-stakes decisions with limited information, and shouldering the responsibility for others' livelihoods. This psychological endurance is the ultimate differentiator.

In an era of accelerating change, a manager's role is to be like a willow tree. They must provide a sturdy, stable vision for the team while remaining highly flexible in how they adapt to storms and changing conditions. This combination builds team resilience.

High-stakes business requires not just intellect but the capacity to handle immense emotional pressure. This 'emotional endurance,' often forged through personal hardship, provides a critical competitive edge during moments of extreme stress, such as a multi-billion dollar negotiation where the outcome is uncertain.

The most paralyzing decisions for a leader aren't clear-cut choices but dilemmas where every path is painful. Ben Horowitz's decision to take his company public with minimal revenue was a bad idea, but the alternative—bankruptcy—was worse. The key skill is choosing the 'slightly better' path in the abyss, despite the guaranteed negative feedback.

When facing an existential business threat, the most effective response is to suppress emotional panic and adopt a calm, methodical mindset, like a pilot running through an emergency checklist. This allows for clear, logical decision-making when stakes are highest and prevents paralysis from fear.

Beyond IQ and EQ, interview for 'Resilience Quotient' (RQ)—the ability to persevere through setbacks. A key tactic is to ask candidates about their proudest achievement, then follow up with, 'What would you do differently?' to see how they navigated strife and learned from it.

"Executive presence" is often a biased and ill-defined concept. Brené Brown proposes a better model from football: "pocket presence," a quarterback's ability to think and act under pressure. This is a teachable competency for leaders, comprising anticipatory thinking, temporal awareness, and situational awareness.

A Leader's 'Stomach' for Uncertainty is a More Critical Skill Than Talent or Intelligence | RiffOn