Many brands realize the data in their standard dashboards isn't real-time, sometimes being weeks or a month old. This makes it unreliable for AI-driven decisions like dynamic pricing, forcing a shift toward questioning data sources and timeliness instead of blind trust.

Related Insights

Smart leaders end up in panic mode not because their tactics are wrong, but because their entire data infrastructure is broken. They are using a data model built for a simple lead-gen era to answer complex questions about today's nuanced buyer journeys, leading to reactive, tactical decisions instead of strategic ones.

When pipeline slips, leaders default to launching more experiments and adopting new tools. This isn't strategic; it's a panicked reaction stemming from an outdated data model that can't diagnose the real problem. Leaders are taught that the solution is to 'do more,' which adds noise to an already chaotic system.

When querying ChatGPT for trends or tactics, failing to specify a time period (e.g., 'in the last 60 days') will result in outdated information. The model defaults to data that is, on average, at least a year old, especially for fast-moving fields like marketing.

AI models for campaign creation are only as good as the data they ingest. Inaccurate or siloed data on accounts, contacts, and ad performance prevents AI from developing optimal strategies, rendering the technology ineffective for scalable, high-quality output.

Companies struggle to get value from AI because their data is fragmented across different systems (ERP, CRM, finance) with poor integrity. The primary challenge isn't the AI models themselves, but integrating these disparate data sets into a unified platform that agents can act upon.

For marketers running time-sensitive promotions, the traditional ETL process of moving data to a lakehouse for analysis is too slow. By the time insights on campaign performance are available, the opportunity to adjust tactics (like changing a discount for the second half of a day-long sale) has already passed, directly impacting revenue and customer experience.

The primary reason multi-million dollar AI initiatives stall or fail is not the sophistication of the models, but the underlying data layer. Traditional data infrastructure creates delays in moving and duplicating information, preventing the real-time, comprehensive data access required for AI to deliver business value. The focus on algorithms misses this foundational roadblock.

Traditional, static benchmarks for AI models go stale almost immediately. The superior approach is creating dynamic benchmarks that update constantly based on real-world usage and user preferences, which can then be turned into products themselves, like an auto-routing API.

The traditional approach of building a central data lake fails because data is often stale by the time migration is complete. The modern solution is a 'zero copy' framework that connects to data where it lives. This eliminates data drift and provides real-time intelligence without endless, costly migrations.

The traditional marketing focus on acquiring 'more data' for larger audiences is becoming obsolete. As AI increasingly drives content and offer generation, the cost of bad data skyrockets. Flawed inputs no longer just waste ad spend; they create poor experiences, making data quality, not quantity, the new imperative.

Retailers Are Discovering Their Trusted Dashboards Use Dangerously Outdated Data | RiffOn