David Remnick acknowledges and embraces his magazine's identity as the "orthodox church of liberalism." This clear, unapologetic positioning creates a strong sense of community and loyalty. For a subscription business, serving a devoted "congregation" is more profitable than chasing a broad, dispassionate audience.
Related Insights
The newsletter's creator, Dan Kohler, openly messages that subscription revenue funds a special needs trust for his disabled son. This personal, heartfelt mission transforms the payment from a simple transaction into an act of community support, tugging at heartstrings and driving subscriptions.
A successful rebrand doesn't create a new personality; it amplifies the company's true, existing identity. Just as money magnifies a person's character, a strong brand makes a company's core values—like community involvement—bigger, louder, and more public, forcing them to be more intentional.
David Remnick contrasts The New Yorker's "stately" weekly metabolism with The Atlantic's faster, "reported op-ed" approach. He views it not as a better or worse strategy, but simply a different one. This highlights a conscious choice to protect the brand’s identity by refusing to compete on speed and volume.
Post-interview analysis suggests The New Yorker outlasted competitors by holding tight to its identity rather than chasing trends. While other magazines from its era pivoted to match the internet's pace and failed, The New Yorker's deliberate, slow evolution protected its core value, proving that resistance to change can be a strength.
Brand love is often less about the product and more about what it symbolizes about the consumer. In an era of 'hyper-identity,' brands become signals people use to communicate their personal values and nuances. Marketing should focus on what the brand says about its user.
David Remnick, admitting he didn't know parentheses on a balance sheet meant losses, successfully pivoted The New Yorker to a subscription-first model. He identified the brand's deep reader loyalty as an untapped asset, correctly predicting it could outweigh declining ad revenue in a crucial move for legacy media.
A brand that tries to please everyone is memorable to no one. To build a truly strong brand, you must be willing to be disliked by some. Intentionally defining who your customer is *not* and creating polarizing content sharpens your identity, fostering a passionate community among those who love what you stand for.
Stuart Shuffman argues his model is highly replicable because local publishers can build deep trust that national brands can't. This trust makes it easier to sell ads directly to local businesses, who see their spending as both a marketing tool and a form of community patronage.
David Remnick equates his decision to stay off Twitter with marrying the right person. He argues it is a strategic choice to protect his focus and mental health from the platform's negativity and distraction. For a top editor, curating one's own inputs is as important as curating the publication's outputs.