David Remnick contrasts The New Yorker's "stately" weekly metabolism with The Atlantic's faster, "reported op-ed" approach. He views it not as a better or worse strategy, but simply a different one. This highlights a conscious choice to protect the brand’s identity by refusing to compete on speed and volume.

Related Insights

Contrary to the belief that costly journalism is subsidized by lifestyle products, the NYT CEO asserts that hardcore news is the most economically value-creating part of the business because it generates a massive audience and brand authority.

The strategy for reviving print media is not to compete with digital, but to reframe physical scarcity as a luxury feature. By offering a print edition as a hyper-exclusive, expensive product available only in a few elite zip codes, it becomes a status symbol.

BroBible consciously resisted the industry-wide pivot to SEO-driven "how-to" articles and buying guides. Recognizing they couldn't win by following the crowd, they instead focused on their unique strength: covering cultural figures and the "in-between" stories in sports, which differentiated their brand.

Outside's acquisition of 20+ publications failed because it used a "broad brushed" approach. It ignored the unique cultures, business models, and reader relationships of each title, leading to internal chaos and the founder's departure from his own company, Cycling Tips.

Post-interview analysis suggests The New Yorker outlasted competitors by holding tight to its identity rather than chasing trends. While other magazines from its era pivoted to match the internet's pace and failed, The New Yorker's deliberate, slow evolution protected its core value, proving that resistance to change can be a strength.

Editor David Remnick reveals that his role in choosing fiction or cartoons is a "convenient fiction." His department heads, as deep subject matter experts, vet thousands of submissions down to a select few. This collaborative model empowers experts and ensures quality while preserving the editor's ultimate, but rarely used, veto power.

David Remnick, admitting he didn't know parentheses on a balance sheet meant losses, successfully pivoted The New Yorker to a subscription-first model. He identified the brand's deep reader loyalty as an untapped asset, correctly predicting it could outweigh declining ad revenue in a crucial move for legacy media.

Despite declining viewership, legacy media institutions like The New York Times and Washington Post remain critical because they produce the raw content and shape the narratives that fuel the entire digital ecosystem. They provide the 'coal' that other platforms burn for engagement, giving them unrecognized leverage.

David Remnick acknowledges and embraces his magazine's identity as the "orthodox church of liberalism." This clear, unapologetic positioning creates a strong sense of community and loyalty. For a subscription business, serving a devoted "congregation" is more profitable than chasing a broad, dispassionate audience.

David Remnick equates his decision to stay off Twitter with marrying the right person. He argues it is a strategic choice to protect his focus and mental health from the platform's negativity and distraction. For a top editor, curating one's own inputs is as important as curating the publication's outputs.

The New Yorker Intentionally Ignores The Atlantic's High-Volume, News-Driven Strategy | RiffOn