Post-interview analysis suggests The New Yorker outlasted competitors by holding tight to its identity rather than chasing trends. While other magazines from its era pivoted to match the internet's pace and failed, The New Yorker's deliberate, slow evolution protected its core value, proving that resistance to change can be a strength.
Related Insights
A brand's history is a valuable asset. The most powerful ideas for future growth are often rooted in the brand's 'archaeology.' Reviving timeless concepts, like the Pepsi Taste Challenge, and making them culturally relevant today is often more effective than chasing novelty.
Enduring 'stay-up' brands don't need to fundamentally reinvent their core product. Instead, they should focus on creating opportunities for consumers to 'reappraise' the brand in a current context. The goal is to make the familiar feel fresh and relevant again, connecting it to modern culture.
Breakthrough companies often succeed not by iterating endlessly, but by 'planting a flag'—making a strong, often contrarian bet on a core thesis (e.g., email-first media) and relentlessly executing against that vision, even when it's unpopular or lacks momentum.
Companies like Nintendo and bands like Radiohead achieved longevity by pursuing their own vision, even when it contradicted what their fans wanted. This willingness to alienate the current audience is a key, albeit risky, path to true innovation and creating cult classics.
BroBible consciously resisted the industry-wide pivot to SEO-driven "how-to" articles and buying guides. Recognizing they couldn't win by following the crowd, they instead focused on their unique strength: covering cultural figures and the "in-between" stories in sports, which differentiated their brand.
David Remnick contrasts The New Yorker's "stately" weekly metabolism with The Atlantic's faster, "reported op-ed" approach. He views it not as a better or worse strategy, but simply a different one. This highlights a conscious choice to protect the brand’s identity by refusing to compete on speed and volume.
Big Cabal Media's publication Zococo successfully transitioned its brand from a "BuzzFeed-y" model of quizzes and listicles to a more prestigious format resembling New York Magazine's The Cut. They now focus on long-form, first-person interviews and deeper stories, showing a clear path for evolving a media brand's depth and appeal as its audience matures.
David Remnick, admitting he didn't know parentheses on a balance sheet meant losses, successfully pivoted The New Yorker to a subscription-first model. He identified the brand's deep reader loyalty as an untapped asset, correctly predicting it could outweigh declining ad revenue in a crucial move for legacy media.
Despite declining viewership, legacy media institutions like The New York Times and Washington Post remain critical because they produce the raw content and shape the narratives that fuel the entire digital ecosystem. They provide the 'coal' that other platforms burn for engagement, giving them unrecognized leverage.
David Remnick acknowledges and embraces his magazine's identity as the "orthodox church of liberalism." This clear, unapologetic positioning creates a strong sense of community and loyalty. For a subscription business, serving a devoted "congregation" is more profitable than chasing a broad, dispassionate audience.