To avoid generic, 'purple AI slop' UIs, create a custom design system for your AI tool. Use 'reverse prompting': feed an LLM like ChatGPT screenshots of a target app (e.g., Uber) and ask it to extrapolate the foundational design system (colors, typography). Use this output as a custom instruction.

Related Insights

Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.

Instead of accepting default AI designs, proactively source superior design elements. Use pre-vetted Google Font combinations for typography and find specific MidJourney 'style reference' codes on social platforms like X to generate unique, high-quality images that match your desired aesthetic.

Move beyond basic AI prototyping by exporting your design system into a machine-readable format like JSON. By feeding this into an AI agent, you can generate high-fidelity, on-brand components and code that engineers can use directly, dramatically accelerating the path from idea to implementation.

A custom instruction defines your design system's principles (e.g., spacing, color), but it's most effective when paired with a pre-defined component library (e.g., buttons). The instruction tells the AI *how* to arrange things, while the library provides the consistent building blocks, yielding more coherent results.

A practical AI workflow for product teams is to screenshot their current application and prompt an AI to clone it with modifications. This allows for rapid visualization of new features and UI changes, creating an efficient feedback loop for product development.

Claude Opus 4.5 allows users to install a specific 'front-end design skill' with two simple prompts. This non-obvious feature instructs the model to avoid typical AI design clichés and generate production-grade interfaces, resulting in significantly more unique and professional-looking UIs.

Generic AI app generation is a commodity. To create valuable, production-ready apps, AI models need deep context. This "Brand OS" combines a company's design system (visual identity) and CMS content (brand voice). Providing this unique context is the key to generating applications that are instantly on-brand.

The true creative potential for AI in design isn't generating safe, average outputs based on training data. Instead, AI should act as a tool to help designers interpolate between different styles and push them into novel, underexplored aesthetic territories, fostering originality rather than conformity.

AI coding tools generate functional but often generic designs. The key to creating a beautiful, personalized application is for the human to act as a creative director. This involves rejecting default outputs, finding specific aesthetic inspirations, and guiding the AI to implement a curated human vision.

Lovable is a solid AI tool for rapid prototyping, but its reliance on default UI libraries like Tailwind CSS results in products that all share a similar aesthetic. This lack of visual diversity is a significant drawback for creating a unique brand identity or user experience.