The transition from a C-suite operator managing thousands to an investor is jarring. New VCs must adapt from leading large teams to being individual contributors who write their own memos and do their own sourcing. This "scaling down" ability, not just prior success, predicts their success as an investor.
Related Insights
Instead of building a platform team of specialists, Eclipse operates like a small special forces unit. A lean team of senior partners, all ex-operators, handles everything from thesis creation to scaling companies. This ensures founders get direct support from proven builders, not junior staff.
The most effective operators, dubbed 'dolphins,' can fluidly move between altitudes: operating strategically at 10,000 feet with founders, managing at 5,000 feet, and executing tactically in the weeds at 1,000 feet. This ability to oscillate is a key trait to hire for, especially in advisory or early-stage leadership roles.
VCs who spin out of tech giants like Airbnb have a powerful initial network. However, this edge typically expires after their third fund as original colleagues move on, forcing them to build a more durable, independent network to source deals.
Founders often start scrappy out of necessity and dream of lavish resources. However, once successful, many realize that small, lean, and scrappy teams are more effective. This creates a paradox where the most successful entrepreneurs intentionally revert to the resource-constrained mindset they once tried to escape.
Founders often chase executives from successful scaled companies. However, these execs can fail because their experience makes them overly critical and resistant to the painful, hands-on work required at an early stage. The right hire is often someone a few layers down from the star executive.
A founder's role is constantly changing—from individual contributor to manager to culture builder. Success requires being self-aware enough to recognize you're always in a new, unfamiliar role you're not yet good at. Sticking to the old job you mastered is a primary cause of failure to scale.
Large, contrarian investments feel like career risk to partners in a traditional VC firm, leading to bureaucracy and diluted conviction. Founder-led firms with small, centralized decision-making teams can operate with more decisiveness, enabling them to make the bold, potentially firm-defining bets that consensus-driven partnerships would avoid.
Unlike operating companies that seek consistency, VC firms hunt for outliers. This requires a 'stewardship' model that empowers outlier talent with autonomy. A traditional, top-down CEO model that enforces uniformity would stifle the very contrarian thinking necessary for venture success. The job is to enable, not manage.
Lior Susan highlights the biggest mental hurdle for former operators becoming VCs: internalizing the power law. Operators are builders wired to fix problems and believe they can turn any situation around. In VC, success is driven by a few massive outliers, requiring focus on winners, not on fixing every company.
Most VCs fail at talent support by simply matching logos on a resume to a portfolio company. A better model is to first embed operators (e.g., fractional sales leaders) into the startup. This provides the deep, nuanced context required to find candidates who fit the specific business and culture, leading to better hiring outcomes.