Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Mid-year, review your performance as if you were an opposing football team. Identify your predictable strengths that a competitor would want to neutralize and your weaknesses they would exploit. This objective analysis reveals areas for improvement and opportunities to leverage.

Related Insights

Many reps know their calls are recorded for managers, but few take the initiative to self-assess their performance. Top performers proactively review their own "game film" to identify areas for improvement, rather than passively waiting for feedback from their coach.

To break the 'crush it or drown' cycle, perform a structured quarterly audit of your activities. Identify what worked (seeds), what failed (weeds), and what you should start doing (needs). This reveals the specific behaviors driving your results.

Instead of viewing a 40% close rate as a static success metric, reframe the remaining 60% as your "opportunity rate." This mental shift changes the focus from what you've achieved to the potential that still exists, encouraging a proactive search for improvements in your sales process.

To conduct a structured self-review, identify 20 key sales elements—from mindset to closing—and rate yourself from 1 to 5 on each. This creates a 100-point scale that clearly highlights your top-performing areas (the 5s to double down on) and your most critical development needs (the 2s and 3s).

View metrics like call volume and conversion rates not just as numbers for your manager, but as your personal scoreboard. This perspective provides immediate, unbiased feedback on your own performance. It shifts the focus from external pressure to internal analysis, empowering you to identify weak spots and take ownership of your improvement.

Instead of only tracking final sales, use a detailed system to code every interaction (e.g., opportunity found, pitch made, closed/not closed). This data reveals the precise bottleneck in a salesperson's process—be it prospecting, pitching, or closing—allowing for targeted, effective coaching.

To fix performance issues, managers can facilitate a team-based retrospective. The 'Seeds, Weeds, Needs' framework helps reps identify what worked (Seeds), what was ineffective (Weeds), and what new actions are required (Needs). This empowers the team to collaboratively diagnose and solve its own problems.

The ultimate test of a sales organization's strength is a simple thought experiment: if you switched products with your main competitor, could your team still outsell them? If the answer is no, it reveals a dependency on product features over a superior, scalable sales process and culture.

A common, yet often unnoticed, sales killer is ceasing the very activities that built a strong pipeline. Reps prospect hard when they need business, then stop once they get busy serving new clients, creating a boom-bust cycle. A mid-year review should identify effective past activities that have been abandoned.

Ask a candidate to rate their sales ability on a 1-10 scale. Then, ask what specific skill, if mastered, would move them up one point. This trick question forces them to reveal a genuine area for improvement, demonstrating self-awareness and coachability.

Adopt a 'Self-Scouting' Mindset by Analyzing Your Sales Performance Like a Competitor | RiffOn