While private companies like SpaceX drive innovation, the decline of public agencies like NASA removes a powerful, non-partisan source of national pride. Shared national endeavors create "connective tissue" that brings citizens together across political divides, a cultural benefit that private, profit-driven enterprise cannot replicate.
Related Insights
To avoid organizational decay, government agencies like NASA should be established with a fixed lifespan (e.g., 10 years). At sunset, they would be forced to reconstitute, allowing for a re-evaluation of their mission and shedding of unproductive labs, ensuring continued relevance and success.
The debate around Jared Isaacman's nomination for NASA head highlights the central conflict in space policy: prioritizing the Moon (Artemis, countering China) versus Mars (SpaceX's goal). This strategic choice about celestial bodies, not political affiliation, is the defining challenge for NASA's next leader, with massive implications for funding and geopolitics.
The "Genesis Mission" aims to use national labs' data and supercomputers for AI-driven science. This initiative marks a potential strategic shift away from the prevailing tech belief that breakthroughs like AGI will emerge exclusively from private corporations, reasserting a key role for government-led R&D in fundamental innovation.
The most effective government role in innovation is to act as a catalyst for high-risk, foundational R&D (like DARPA creating the internet). Once a technology is viable, the government should step aside to allow private sector competition (like SpaceX) to drive down costs and accelerate progress.
A major shift in government procurement for space defense now favors startups. The need for rapid innovation in a newly contested space environment has moved the government from merely tolerating startups to actively seeking them out over traditional prime contractors.
A key reason for past legislative success was that leaders shared a common identity forged in military service. Reinstating mandatory national service could create 'connective tissue' among diverse young people, fostering a unified identity as citizens first and foremost, before individual identity groups.
Describing space exploration as a 'cash grab' isn't cynical; it's a recognition of fundamental human motivation. Money acts as 'proof of work,' incentivizing people to dedicate time and resources to difficult, long-term goals. Without a profit motive, ambitious endeavors like becoming a multi-planetary species would never attract the necessary capital and talent.
The confirmation of NASA's administrator hinges on a fundamental strategic question: Moon or Mars? This isn't just a scientific debate but a political and economic one, affecting different contractors, constituents, and geopolitical goals, like counterbalancing China's progress on the moon. The choice dictates NASA's entire focus.
The true danger isn't partisan bickering but the collapse of shared cultural institutions like family, faith, and community. These provided a common identity and purpose that held the nation together, and their erosion leaves a void that politics cannot fill, removing the nation's "center of gravity."
Society functions because humans cooperate based on shared beliefs like values or religion. These systems act as a shorthand for trust and alignment, allowing cooperation between strangers. This makes the erosion of a common value set the most significant threat to societal cohesion.
