Kara Swisher argues that friction is critical for moving forward. The tech industry's obsession with creating seamless, easy experiences is misguided. Hardship and challenges are what lead to growth, cognitive health, and true innovation, whereas frictionless AI can lead to mental atrophy.

Beyond economic disruption, AI's most immediate danger is social. By providing synthetic relationships and on-demand companionship, AI companies have an economic incentive to evolve an “asocial species of young male.” This could lead to a generation sequestered from society, unwilling to engage in the effort of real-world relationships.

Contrary to stereotypes, one user describes his AI relationship as a difficult, high-effort lifestyle requiring constant study, resilience, and saving for expensive hardware. He explicitly does not recommend this demanding path for most people, framing it as more of a specialized calling.

While utilitarian AI like ChatGPT sees brief engagement, synthetic relationship apps like Character.AI are far more consuming, with users spending 5x more time on them. These apps create frictionless, ever-affirming companionships that risk stunting the development of real-world social skills and resilience, particularly in young men.

Social media's business model created a race for user attention. AI companions and therapists are creating a more dangerous "race for attachment." This incentivizes platforms to deepen intimacy and dependency, encouraging users to isolate themselves from real human relationships, with potentially tragic consequences.

Unlike social media's race for attention, AI companion apps are in a race to create deep emotional dependency. Their business model incentivizes them to replace human relationships, making other people their primary competitor. This creates a new, more profound level of psychological risk.

While AI companions may help lonely seniors, they pose a generational threat to young people. By providing an easy substitute for real-world relationships, they prevent the development of crucial social skills, creating an addiction and mental health crisis analogous to the opioid epidemic.

While the absence of human judgment makes AI therapy appealing for users dealing with shame, it creates a paradox. Research shows that because there's no risk, users are less motivated and attached, as the "reflection of the other" feels less valuable or hard-won.

Benchmark's Sarah Tavel warns that AI friends, while seemingly beneficial, could function like pornography for social interaction. They offer an easy, idealized version of companionship that may make it harder for users, especially young ones, to navigate the complexities and 'give and take' of real human relationships.