Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Traditional observability tools' usage-based pricing forces customers to limit monitoring. GroundCover's BYOC model puts the data plane in the customer's cloud, enabling a fixed per-host price that encourages comprehensive data collection without fear of runaway costs.

Related Insights

To ease customer anxiety about runaway costs from its new AI agents, Notion is implementing usage-based pricing but delaying actual billing for several months. This grace period allows users to see their metered usage, understand the value, and adjust, mitigating the fear of unpredictable bills before they have to pay.

Usage-based pricing for AI faces strong customer resistance. Unlike cloud storage where usage is directly controlled, AI credit consumption can be driven by new vendor-pushed features. This lack of control and predictability leads to bill shock, making customers prefer the stability of per-seat models.

While the AI industry standardized on usage-based pricing, Featherless AI offered a flat monthly rate. This solved their own problem of pricing thousands of models and addressed enterprise customers' fear of unpredictable 'bill shock,' which was a major barrier to AI adoption and procurement.

Traditional per-seat SaaS models are failing as AI agents can access services via APIs without needing a paid seat. Bolt's CEO argues companies must shift to usage-based pricing that bills for value delivered, not just access. This aligns cost with utility in an agent-driven world and represents a fundamental business model shift.

The dominant per-user-per-month SaaS business model is becoming obsolete for AI-native companies. The new standard is consumption or outcome-based pricing. Customers will pay for the specific task an AI completes or the value it generates, not for a seat license, fundamentally changing how software is sold.

AI SaaS companies have variable, usage-based costs, but customers demand predictable flat fees for procurement. Product Fruits found charging per usage failed. The solution is to accept the uncertainty, create flat-fee plans, and absorb the risk of variable backend costs to close deals.

Enterprise buyers are hesitant to adopt new AI tools due to unclear, consumption-based pricing from vendors like ServiceNow. Lacking transparency on how 'meters' work or what future usage will cost, customers fear 'locked-in cost increases' and a new form of vendor lock-in, which is slowing down sales cycles.

The shift to usage-based pricing for AI tools isn't just a revenue growth strategy. Enterprise vendors are adopting it to offset their own escalating cloud infrastructure costs, which scale directly with customer usage, thereby protecting their profit margins from their own suppliers.

With AI agents reducing the need for human users, the per-seat SaaS model is becoming obsolete. The future lies in outcome-based pricing, where vendors charge for tangible results like cost savings or tickets resolved. This aligns incentives, forces vendors to prove ROI, and creates a true partnership with customers.

As AI agents perform more work and human headcount decreases, the traditional seat-based pricing model becomes obsolete. The value is no longer tied to human users. SaaS companies must transition to consumption-based models that charge for the automated work performed and value generated by AI.

GroundCover's "Bring Your Own Cloud" Model Disrupts Usage-Based SaaS Pricing | RiffOn