To stop a persistent negative line of questioning, use specific internal statistics. For example, responding to claims of poor quality with a five-star rating figure. Journalists are less likely to challenge hard data they cannot immediately disprove.
Related Insights
Instead of waiting to be attacked for your weaknesses, preemptively address them yourself. By owning or diffusing the negative points first, you disarm your opponent, leaving them with nothing to say. This 'prebuttal' strategy seizes the narrative advantage by controlling the initial framing.
Vague stories can sound fabricated. Including specific, non-round numbers or precise facts (e.g., "it was 4.2" instead of "around 4") makes a narrative feel more authentic and tangible. This grounds the story in reality and enhances the salesperson's integrity and credibility.
When an employee rates their job satisfaction as a 3 out of 10, asking 'Why so high?' disrupts their negative thought pattern. It forces them to acknowledge what's working, even if minimal. This shifts the conversation from complaining to identifying positive elements to build upon.
To quantify a problem without being confrontational, use a "push-pull" approach. First, "push" by suggesting a number ("This probably costs you $45k..."). Then, "pull" back by offering an out ("...or is this pennies in the barrel?"). This relieves pressure and encourages an honest, quantitative response.
Navigate disagreements with a four-step method: use uncertain language (Hedge), find common ground (Emphasize Agreement), demonstrate what you heard (Acknowledge), and frame points positively instead of negatively (Reframe). This prevents conversations from spiraling into negativity.
To broach a sensitive topic, Andrew Ross Sorkin reads a critical quote from another source. This technique shifts the focus from a personal attack ("I think you...") to a public concern ("Others are saying..."). It forces the interviewee to grapple with an issue they have likely already considered, leading to a more thoughtful response.
When a journalist uses an emotive, negative word like "crisis" in a question, do not repeat it in your answer. Reframe it with a more neutral term like "issue" or "challenge" to prevent your soundbite from reinforcing the negative narrative.
To avoid making prohibited forward-looking statements to investors, a CEO advised his CMO to reframe answers. When asked about the future, respond with a story about a past event or success that demonstrates capability and strategy, effectively answering the question without speculation.
Instead of personally challenging a guest, read a critical quote about them from another source. This reframes you as a neutral moderator giving them a chance to respond, rather than an attacker. The guest has likely already prepared an answer for known criticisms.
To cut through rhetoric and assess a claim's validity, ask the direct question: "What is your best evidence that the argument you've just made is true?" The response immediately exposes the foundation of their argument, revealing whether it's baseless, rests on weak anecdotes, or is backed by robust data.