Instead of focusing only on federal elections, Fonda's climate PAC targets local races like city councils and school boards. This builds a "firewall" against opposition and creates a pipeline of experienced, climate-focused candidates for higher office, mirroring the Tea Party's successful grassroots approach.
Related Insights
Jane Fonda attributes the Democratic Party's struggles in the middle of the country to a fundamental shift in strategy. She claims the party "got in bed with its donors" and abandoned its practice of funding local, on-the-ground community organizing, thereby losing touch with the very people it needed to represent.
The national political conversation on AI isn't led by D.C. think tanks but by local communities protesting the impact of data centers on electricity prices and resources. This organic, grassroots opposition means national politicians are playing catch-up to voter sentiment.
While national politics can be divisive and disheartening, city-level initiatives offer hope. In a local context, people are neighbors who must collaborate, respect each other's humanity, and work towards a common goal of improving their community. This forced cooperation creates a positive, inspiring model for progress.
Modern populists gain influence by creating organic content that captures algorithmic attention, effectively turning a small campaign budget into disproportionate reach. This bottom-up strategy bypasses traditional, money-driven political machines by treating social attention as the primary currency, not dollars.
Major societal shifts, like universal childcare, don't start with national legislation. They begin when communities model a different way of operating. By creating local support systems and demonstrating their effectiveness, citizens provide a blueprint that can be scaled into state and national policy.
Bradley Tusk, known for his work with Uber, advises startups to focus their regulatory efforts on state and local governments. He argues that achieving federal-level change is akin to a miracle. In contrast, states offer 50 different opportunities to pass favorable legislation, establish precedent, and build momentum for broader change.
The debate over the Texas Senate race highlights a crucial lesson for Democrats: winning requires selecting the "right person for the right race." This prioritizes candidates whose profiles fit the local electorate over nationally recognized figures who might energize the base but alienate crucial swing voters in a general election.
Effective activism doesn't try to persuade politicians or stage a revolution. Instead, it should 'inject a retrovirus': build and run privately-funded alternative institutions (like citizens' assemblies) that operate on a different logic. By demonstrating a better way of doing things, this strategy creates demand and allows new institutional 'DNA' to spread organically.
Expecting top-down change from political party leadership is a flawed strategy. True societal transformation starts with grassroots movements and shifts in public sentiment. Political parties are reactive entities that eventually adopt agendas forced upon them by the people they seek to represent, making them followers, not initiators, of change.
Expecting politicians to vote themselves out of a job is unrealistic. The path to reform is a bottom-up approach, using numerous local citizen assemblies to prove their value. When politicians realize these assemblies can solve problems and reconcile people with the system, they will adopt them to secure their own legitimacy and hold onto power.
