AI will make the production of investment memos and rote analysis functionally free. The role of an investment analyst will therefore evolve from creating this content to prompting, steering, and quality-assuring the output of AI agents. The job becomes about evaluation and verification, not initial generation.
Related Insights
As AI coding agents generate vast amounts of code, the most tedious part of a developer's job shifts from writing code to reviewing it. This creates a new product opportunity: building tools that help developers validate and build confidence in AI-written code, making the review process less of a chore.
Previously, data analysis required deep proficiency in tools like Excel. Now, AI platforms handle the technical manipulation, making the ability to ask insightful business questions—not technical skill—the most valuable asset for generating insights.
As AI evolves from single-task tools to autonomous agents, the human role transforms. Instead of simply using AI, professionals will need to manage and oversee multiple AI agents, ensuring their actions are safe, ethical, and aligned with business goals, acting as a critical control layer.
If AI were perfect, it would simply replace tasks. Because it is imperfect and requires nuanced interaction, it creates demand for skilled professionals who can prompt, verify, and creatively apply it. This turns AI's limitations into a tool that requires and rewards human proficiency.
Top-performing engineering teams are evolving from hands-on coding to a managerial role. Their primary job is to define tasks, kick off multiple AI agents in parallel, review plans, and approve the final output, rather than implementing the details themselves.
The job of an individual contributor is no longer about direct execution but about allocation. ICs now act like managers, directing AI agents to perform tasks and using their judgment to prioritize, review, and integrate the output. This represents a fundamental shift in the nature of knowledge work.
AI will handle most routine tasks, reducing the number of average 'doers'. Those remaining will be either the absolute best in their craft or individuals leveraging AI for superhuman productivity. Everyone else must shift to 'director' roles, focusing on strategy, orchestration, and interpreting AI output.
When AI automates a core task like content writing, don't eliminate the role. Instead, reframe it to leverage human judgment. A "content writer" can be transformed into a "content curator" who guides, edits, and validates AI-generated output. This shifts the focus from replacement to augmentation.
As AI generates more code, the core engineering task evolves from writing to reviewing. Developers will spend significantly more time evaluating AI-generated code for correctness, style, and reliability, fundamentally changing daily workflows and skill requirements.
