Objectively track whether new information strengthens or weakens your belief in each holding on a monthly basis. This simple journaling practice forces a regular review, helping you decide whether to add capital or trim a position based on fundamentals, not share price movement.
Related Insights
Regularly re-evaluate your investment theses. Stubbornly holding onto an initial belief despite new, contradictory information can lead to significant losses. This framework encourages adaptation by forcing you to re-earn your conviction at regular intervals, preventing belief calcification.
The discipline of writing down your thought process is crucial for decision analysis. AI now amplifies this by creating a searchable, analyzable record of your thinking over time, helping you identify blind spots and get objective feedback on your reasoning.
The act of consistently publishing ideas, such as in a weekly newsletter, imposes a discipline that rewires your brain. It forces you to organize complex thoughts, articulate them clearly, and ultimately improves your entire decision-making process in investing, business, and life.
To combat self-deception, write down specific predictions about politics, the economy, or your life and review them 6-12 months later. This provides an objective measure of your judgment, forcing you to analyze where you were wrong and adjust the thought patterns that led to the incorrect forecast.
To avoid emotional, performance-chasing mistakes, write down your selling criteria in advance and intentionally exclude recent performance from the list. This forces a focus on more rational reasons, such as a broken investment thesis, manager changes, excessive fees, or shifting personal goals, thereby preventing reactionary decisions based on market noise.
Successful investing requires strong conviction. However, investors must avoid becoming so emotionally attached to their thesis or a company that they ignore or misinterpret clear negative signals. The key is to remain objective and data-driven, even when you believe strongly in an investment.
Our brains are wired to find evidence that supports our existing beliefs. To counteract this dangerous bias in investing, actively search for dissenting opinions and information that challenge your thesis. A crucial question to ask is, 'What would need to happen for me to be wrong about this investment?'
To avoid emotional decision-making, especially with losing positions, write down the specific criteria for any investment. Then, backtest those rules against historical data. This replaces emotional struggle with a systematic, data-driven process.
To combat endowment effect and status quo bias, legendary trader Paul Tudor Jones advises viewing every position as if you were deciding to put it on today. This creates a zero-based mindset, forcing you to justify each holding's continued place in your portfolio.
While having a disciplined rule like reviewing a stock after 24 months is useful, it should be subordinate to a more critical rule: sell immediately if the fundamental investment thesis breaks. This flexibility prevents holding onto a losing position simply to adhere to a predefined timeline.
