In five years, NVIDIA may still command over 50% of AI chip revenue while shipping a minority of total chips. Its powerful brand will allow it to charge premium prices that few competitors can match, maintaining financial dominance even as the market diversifies with lower-cost alternatives.
Related Insights
By funding and backstopping CoreWeave, which exclusively uses its GPUs, NVIDIA establishes its hardware as the default for the AI cloud. This gives NVIDIA leverage over major customers like Microsoft and Amazon, who are developing their own chips. It makes switching to proprietary silicon more difficult, creating a competitive moat based on market structure, not just technology.
A single year of Nvidia's revenue is greater than the last 25 years of R&D and capex from the top five semiconductor equipment companies combined. This suggests a massive 'capex overhang,' meaning the primary bottleneck for AI compute isn't the ability to build fabs, but the financial arrangements to de-risk their construction.
While known for its GPUs, NVIDIA's true competitive moat is CUDA, a free software platform that made its hardware accessible for diverse applications like research and AI. This created a powerful network effect and stickiness that competitors struggled to replicate, making NVIDIA more of a software company than observers realize.
Google training its top model, Gemini 3 Pro, on its own TPUs demonstrates a viable alternative to NVIDIA's chips. However, because Google does not sell its TPUs, NVIDIA remains the only seller for every other company, effectively maintaining monopoly pricing power over the rest of the market.
NVIDIA’s business model relies on planned obsolescence. Its AI chips become obsolete every 2-3 years as new versions are released, forcing Big Tech customers into a constant, multi-billion dollar upgrade cycle for what are effectively "perishable" assets.
In a power-constrained world, total cost of ownership is dominated by the revenue a data center can generate per watt. A superior NVIDIA system producing multiples more revenue makes the hardware cost irrelevant. A competitor's chip would be rejected even if free due to the high opportunity cost.
The current AI landscape mirrors the historic Windows-Intel duopoly. OpenAI is the new Microsoft, controlling the user-facing software layer, while NVIDIA acts as the new Intel, dominating essential chip infrastructure. This parallel suggests a long-term power concentration is forming.
The debate on whether AI can reach $1T in revenue is misguided; it's already reality. Core services from hyperscalers like TikTok, Meta, and Google have recently shifted from CPUs to AI on GPUs. Their entire revenue base is now AI-driven, meaning future growth is purely incremental.
OpenAI's deal structures highlight the market's perception of chip providers. NVIDIA commanded a direct investment from OpenAI to secure its chips (a premium). In contrast, AMD had to offer equity warrants to OpenAI to win its business (a discount), reflecting their relative negotiating power.
A key component of NVIDIA's market dominance is its status as the single largest buyer (a monopsony) for High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), a critical part of modern GPUs. This control over a finite supply chain resource creates a major bottleneck for any potential competitor, including hyperscalers.