The "conquering hero" approach of forcing an acquired company to adopt your processes is the cardinal sin of M&A. Omar Tawakol's experience at Oracle showed that protecting an acquisition's unique workflows and incentives leads to growth, while rapid, forced integration destroys value.
Related Insights
When a large company acquires a startup, the natural tendency is to impose its standardized processes. Successful integration requires a balance: knowing which systems to standardize for leverage while allowing the acquired team to maintain its freewheeling, startup-style execution.
A one-size-fits-all integration process can destroy the agility of smaller acquisitions. Rockwell Automation developed separate playbooks for small, medium, and large targets. This tiered approach allows the acquirer to apply necessary safeguards while preserving the target's operational speed, preventing process friction.
Cisco rejects a one-size-fits-all integration timeline. It rapidly integrates corporate functions like HR, finance, and legal for control and compliance. However, it takes a more measured, "surgical" approach with core value drivers like engineering and sales to protect the acquired company's unique strengths.
Many M&A teams focus solely on closing the deal, a critical execution task. The best acquirers succeed by designing a parallel process where integration planning and value creation strategies are developed simultaneously with due diligence, ensuring post-close success.
Deals fail post-close when teams confuse systems integration (IT, HR processes) with value creation (hitting business case targets). The integration plan must be explicitly driven by the value creation thesis—like hiring 10 reps to drive cross-sell—not a generic checklist.
A one-size-fits-all integration can destroy the culture that made an acquisition valuable. When State Street acquired software firm CRD, it intentionally broke from its standard process, allowing CRD to keep its brand identity, facilities, and even email domain to preserve its creative culture and retain key talent.
Failing to integrate acquired businesses onto a unified set of systems (ERP, CRM, accounting) will directly reduce your company's valuation at sale. Acquirers price in the future cost and risk of integration. The speaker estimates his unintegrated portfolio cost him an additional 1-2x EBITDA multiple on his exit.
A detailed, rigid integration plan is fragile. A better approach is to create an "integration thesis" that sets clear "goalposts" and timelines for making key decisions. This allows for flexibility and data-informed choices (e.g., using A/B tests post-close) rather than locking into pre-deal assumptions.
Viewing acquisitions as "consolidations" rather than "roll-ups" shifts focus from simply aggregating EBITDA to strategically integrating culture and operations. This builds a cohesive company that drives incremental organic growth—the true source of value—rather than just relying on multiple arbitrage from increased scale.
A key to M&A success is creating a founder-friendly environment. Avoid killing entrepreneurial spirit by forcing founders into a rigid matrix organization. Instead, maintain the structures that made them successful and accelerate them by providing resources from the parent company.
