Despite fears of fiscal dominance driving yields up, US bond yields have remained controlled. This suggests a "financial repression" scenario is winning, where the Treasury and Federal Reserve coordinate, perhaps through careful auction management, to keep borrowing costs contained and suppress long-term rates.
Related Insights
Despite market speculation about potential cuts to long-end Treasury auction sizes, the primary dealer agenda for the next refunding shows no such intention. The Treasury's focus on other topics suggests it will likely maintain or even increase coupon auction sizes next year, pointing to continued supply pressure.
Contrary to fears of a spike, a major rise in 10-year Treasury yields is unlikely. The current wide gap between long-term yields and the Fed's lower policy rate—a multi-year anomaly—makes these bonds increasingly attractive to buyers. This dynamic creates a natural ceiling on how high long-term rates can go.
Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.
According to BlackRock's CIO Rick Reeder, the critical metric for the economy isn't the Fed Funds Rate, but a stable 10-year Treasury yield. This stability lowers volatility in the mortgage market, which is far more impactful for real-world borrowing, corporate funding, and international investor confidence.
When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.
Over the past few years, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have been working at cross-purposes. While the Fed attempted to remove liquidity from the system via quantitative tightening, the Treasury effectively reinjected it by drawing down its reverse repo facility and focusing issuance on T-bills.
A new market dynamic has emerged where Fed rate cuts cause long-term bond yields to rise, breaking historical patterns. This anomaly is driven by investor concerns over fiscal imbalances and high national debt, meaning monetary easing no longer has its traditional effect on the back end of the yield curve.
When the Treasury does increase coupon issuance, it will concentrate on the front-end and 'belly' of the curve, leaving 20 and 30-year bond auctions unchanged. This strategy reflects slowing structural demand for long-duration bonds and debt optimization models that favor shorter issuance in an environment of higher term premiums.
The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'
In periods of 'fiscal dominance,' where government debt and deficits are high, a central bank's independence inevitably erodes. Its primary function shifts from controlling inflation to ensuring the government can finance its spending, often through financial repression like yield curve control.
