The Federal Reserve’s decision to end Quantitative Tightening (QT) is heavily influenced by a desire to avoid a repeat of the 2019 funding crisis. The 'political economy' of the decision is key, as the Fed aims to prevent giving critics 'ammunition' by demonstrating it can control short-term rates.
The Federal Reserve is expected to buy approximately $280 billion of T-bills in the secondary market next year. This significant demand source provides the Treasury with flexibility, allowing it to temporarily exceed its long-term T-bill share target of 20% without causing market disruption.
Recent spikes in repo rates show funding markets are now highly sensitive to new collateral. The dwindling overnight Reverse Repo (RRP) facility, once a key buffer, is no longer absorbing shocks, indicating liquidity has tightened significantly and Quantitative Tightening (QT) has reached its practical limit.
When the Treasury does increase coupon issuance, it will concentrate on the front-end and 'belly' of the curve, leaving 20 and 30-year bond auctions unchanged. This strategy reflects slowing structural demand for long-duration bonds and debt optimization models that favor shorter issuance in an environment of higher term premiums.
Despite facing a massive $5.5 trillion funding gap through 2030, the Treasury is expected to delay increases to its coupon auction sizes until November of next year. This decision stems from a slightly improved short-term fiscal outlook and a political desire from the administration to project 'no urgency'.
The Fed has a clear hierarchy for managing liquidity post-QT. It will first adjust administered rates like the Standing Repo Facility (SRF) rate and use temporary open market operations (TOMOs) for short-term needs. Direct T-bill purchases are a more distant tool, reserved for 2026, as the system is not yet at 'reserve scarcity'.