When a public health intervention successfully prevents a crisis, the lack of a negative outcome makes the initial action seem like an unnecessary overreaction. This paradox makes it difficult to justify and maintain funding for preventative measures whose success is invisible.
Related Insights
Gladwell argues that when systems like vaccination are highly effective, people feel safe enough to entertain crackpot theories. The success of these systems removes the immediate, tangible stakes, creating a 'moral hazard' that permits intellectual laziness and fantastical thinking.
NYC's ban on smoking in bars, initially met with widespread criticism, became a popular and accepted norm. This shows that effective public health leadership sometimes involves implementing policies that are unpopular at first but create long-term societal benefits.
Leaders often conflate seeing a risk with understanding it. In 2020, officials saw COVID-19 but didn't understand its airborne spread. Conversely, society understands the risk of drunk driving but fails to see it most of the time. Truly managing risk requires addressing both visibility and comprehension.
Effective vaccines eradicate the visible horror of diseases. By eliminating the pain and tragic outcomes from public memory, vaccines work against their own acceptance. People cannot fear what they have never seen, leading to complacency and vaccine hesitancy because the terrifying counterfactual is unimaginable.
Initial public fear over new technologies like AI therapy, while seemingly negative, is actually productive. It creates the social and political pressure needed to establish essential safety guardrails and regulations, ultimately leading to safer long-term adoption.
People often fail to act not because they fear negative consequences (cowardice), but because they believe their actions won't have a positive impact (futility). Recognizing this distinction is critical; overcoming futility requires demonstrating that change is possible, which is different from mitigating risk.
Hesitating to start a project for fear of wasting time and money is a paradox. The most significant waste is the opportunity cost of inaction—staying on the sidelines while revenue and experience are left on the table.
Chronic illnesses like cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer's typically develop over two decades before symptoms appear. This long "runway" is a massive, underutilized opportunity to identify high-risk individuals and intervene, yet medicine typically focuses on treatment only after a disease is established.
This concept, 'prevalence-induced concept change,' shows that as significant problems decrease, our brains don't experience fewer issues. Instead, we expand our definition of a 'problem' to include minor inconveniences, making neutral situations seem threatening. This explains why comfort can paradoxically increase perceived hardship.
Diseases like Ebola and malaria, which primarily affect poor countries, lack market incentives for vaccine R&D. The Ebola vaccine only progressed because it was briefly on a U.S. bioterrorism list created after 9/11, highlighting how market failures require creative, sometimes accidental, incentives to overcome.