Large brands are falling into the trap of "small brand envy," trying to replicate the playbooks of agile D2C startups. This is a flawed strategy, as the tactics required to maintain market leadership are fundamentally different from those used for initial growth.
Product-led models create deep loyalty and organic demand, providing a stable business foundation. Marketing-led models can scale faster but risk high customer churn and rising acquisition costs if the product doesn't resonate, leading to business volatility. An ideal approach blends both strategies for sustainable scale.
Lululemon disrupted giants like Nike by being fashionable and new. Now, as the third-largest sportswear company, it has become the incumbent. The CEO admits they 'relied too heavily on some of our core franchises,' failing to innovate and losing their edge to newer, more exciting brands.
Startups often fail by making a slightly better version of an incumbent's product. This is a losing strategy because the incumbent can easily adapt. The key is to build something so fundamentally different in structure that competitors have a very hard time copying it, ensuring a durable advantage.
Relying solely on performance ads for rapid growth creates a sales machine, not a defensible business. This strategy makes you vulnerable to copycats who will replicate your product and target the same audience for less. Reinvest ad profits into organic content to build a brand moat.
Large CPG players have slow, agency-driven feedback loops. Nimble DTC brands can win by rapidly testing creative, messaging, and offers online, gaining an insurmountable learning advantage. Speed itself becomes the strategic edge, not just a byproduct of being small.
When competing against a resourceful incumbent, a startup's key advantage is speed. Bizzabo outmaneuvered its rival during the pandemic by launching a virtual solution in weeks, not months. This agility allows challenger brands to seize market shifts that larger players are too slow to address.
Blippar found that large, established companies wanted to fit new tech into old media silos (e.g., play a TV ad on a print ad). In contrast, challenger brands like Juice Burst were dream clients. Their risk appetite and hunger for an edge made them willing to experiment and create truly innovative use cases.
Success often leads businesses to replace winning strategies with corporate formalism and an over-reliance on acronyms like ROAS and LTV. Re-embracing the initial, more intuitive and less metric-obsessed "Day 1" mindset can be the key to breaking through plateaus.
Coca-Cola failed with ZICO not by changing its core quality, but by stripping away its ability to adapt. Large corporate systems, built for consistency at scale, enforce rigid processes that stifle the very nimbleness that made a challenger brand successful.
Modern relevance isn't about a single "one-size-fits-all" brand message. It's about understanding and catering to fragmented consumer segments at scale. Startups excel at this, giving them a competitive advantage over incumbents who struggle to adapt.