By pursuing aspirational, "one-off" customers instead of focusing exclusively on the ultra-wealthy, the luxury travel sector is expanding into a fragile market segment. This strategy mirrors the over-expansion that made luxury goods brands vulnerable to economic downturns and brand dilution.

Related Insights

Ferrari's stock plunged after lowering EV sales forecasts. This highlights a critical brand challenge: when a product's value is a sensory experience like an engine's roar, an electric version can dilute the brand's essence and alienate core customers, regardless of its performance.

Spirit's troubles highlight a broader market trend where budget-conscious consumers cut back while the wealthy splurge on luxury. This pattern, once confined to goods, is now evident in services like travel, signaling a potential risk for other budget-focused businesses and an opportunity for luxury brands.

During the 2008 recession, Eurostar found overworked consumers valued short, restorative breaks over long holidays. They successfully marketed travel not as a discretionary spend but as an essential way to "reconnect" and "recharge," leading to a record year despite the economic climate.

For luxury brands, raising prices is a strategic tool to enhance brand perception. Unlike mass-market goods where high prices deter buyers, in luxury, price hikes increase desirability and signal exclusivity. This reinforces the brand's elite status and makes it more coveted.

Luxury travel brands can avoid commoditization by emulating Hermès. This involves maintaining scarcity (like waiting lists for bags), implementing moderate and sensible price increases, and preserving an exclusive, high-touch customer experience. This strategy builds long-term brand value over short-term volume growth.

Brands, especially in luxury, fear diluting their image with platform-native content. This fear is misplaced, as consumers are already defining the brand's perception through user-generated content at scale. Brands must participate to guide the narrative, as the "brand schizophrenia" they fear already exists.

Relying solely on performance ads for rapid growth creates a sales machine, not a defensible business. This strategy makes you vulnerable to copycats who will replicate your product and target the same audience for less. Reinvest ad profits into organic content to build a brand moat.

Many brands aspire to fit into the middle of their category, fearing that being too different will alienate consumers. This pursuit of the average leads to a sea of sameness, where entire industries—from cars to banks—lose their distinctiveness by copying category norms.

A brand's strength can be measured by its "durability"—the permission customers grant it to enter new categories. For example, a "Nike hotel" is conceivable, but a "Hilton shoe" is not. This mental model tests whether your brand is defined by a narrow function or a broad customer relationship.

As luxury brands consolidate into huge corporations, they face a paradox: their prestige relies on exclusivity, but their business models require mass-market scale. The solution is a new paradigm where status is framed as inclusive and 'for everyone,' turning the concept of prestige proletarian.