Palo Alto Networks pursued cloud cybersecurity when experts claimed no one would trust it. Founder Nir Zook saw this skepticism not as a warning, but as a sign of a wide-open market with a significant competitive moat if they could prove the doubters wrong.
Related Insights
The goal of early validation is not to confirm your genius, but to risk being proven wrong before committing resources. Negative feedback is a valuable outcome that prevents building the wrong product. It often reveals that the real opportunity is "a degree to the left" of the original idea.
Breakthrough companies often succeed not by iterating endlessly, but by 'planting a flag'—making a strong, often contrarian bet on a core thesis (e.g., email-first media) and relentlessly executing against that vision, even when it's unpopular or lacks momentum.
Palo Alto Networks insisted on calling its product a "next-gen firewall" despite sales team fears. This forced conversations about replacing incumbents, preventing them from being relegated to a secondary "helper" category and ensuring long-term market leadership.
Figma's market initially seemed too small to attract major VC interest or intense competition, giving them space to build a defensible product. Founders can gain a significant advantage by working in overlooked spaces, provided they have genuine passion to sustain them for a decade or more.
eSentire's founder cautions that being first isn't always an advantage. Pioneers bear the burden of educating customers who don't yet believe a problem exists. This requires immense persistence and surviving a slow period before the market catches up to the founder's vision.
During validation calls for Merge, prospective customers expressed extreme annoyance with the status quo but were skeptical the founders could technically solve it. This combination was the ultimate signal: the pain was immense, and a successful solution would be highly defensible and valuable.
When evaluating revolutionary ideas, traditional Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis is useless. VCs should instead bet on founders with a "world-bending vision" capable of inducing a new market, not just capturing an existing one. Have the humility to admit you can't predict market size and instead back the visionary founder.
To truly validate their idea, Moonshot AI's founders deliberately sought negative feedback. This approach of "trying to get the no's" ensures honest market signals, helping them avoid the trap of false positive validation from contacts who are just being polite.
Dell argues that to take on giants like IBM, you need extreme self-belief and, crucially, naivete—not knowing enough to believe it's impossible. This combination allows founders to ignore conventional wisdom that paralyzes incumbents and invent entirely new approaches.
