The concept of a vast 'mating marketplace' driven by immediate value signals is a recent phenomenon. Evolutionarily, humans formed bonds based on long-term compatibility within small, familiar tribes, suggesting that today's dating apps create an unnatural and potentially detrimental dynamic.

Our brains evolved a highly sensitive system to detect human-like minds, crucial for social cooperation and survival. This system often produces 'false positives,' causing us to humanize pets or robots. This isn't a bug but a feature, ensuring we never miss an actual human encounter, a trade-off vital to our species' success.

Living closely with animals transforms them from generic creatures into unique personalities like 'Lunch the baboon.' This expands one's sense of community beyond humans to include the surrounding wildlife, fostering a deep, relational connection to the environment that is absent in modern urban life.

Humans evolved to cooperate via reciprocity—sharing resources expecting future return. To prevent exploitation, we also evolved a strong instinct to identify and punish "freeloaders." This creates a fundamental tension with social welfare systems that can be perceived as enabling non-contribution.

Our emotional connection to pets makes us almost completely incapable of objective observation. We invent stories and infer motivations that often don't align with scientific reality. This highlights the power of cognitive bias in personal relationships and the need for objective data in understanding behavior.

Charles Darwin first struggled to fit altruism into his theory of natural selection, viewing self-sacrifice as a trait that wouldn't be passed on. He later recognized that cooperation provides a key evolutionary advantage—a view now widely supported, though the "selfishness succeeds" myth persists in the collective imagination.

Compared to other social hunters or domesticated species, dogs do not possess exceptional cognitive abilities in areas like problem-solving or navigation. Their intelligence is adapted for their evolutionary niche, not for passing human-centric tests. This challenges our biased view of animal smarts.

The 'lie' of monogamy is not that it's a bad choice, but that culture has sanctified it as the only valid path. This framing turns non-monogamous people into villains and ignores that polygyny is the biological norm for most animals, including pre-agrarian humans.

It's a profound mystery how evolution encoded high-level desires like seeking social approval. Unlike simple instincts linked to sensory input (e.g., smell), these social goals require complex brain processing to even define. The mechanism by which our genome instills a preference for such abstract concepts is unknown and represents a major gap in our understanding.