If AI makes intelligence cheap and universally available, its economic value may collapse. This theory suggests that selling raw AI models could become a low-margin, utility-like business. Profitability will depend on building moats through specialized applications or regulatory capture, not on selling base intelligence.
Related Insights
AI infrastructure leaders justify massive investments by citing a limitless appetite for intelligence, dismissing concerns about efficiency. This belief ignores that infinite demand doesn't guarantee profit; it can easily lead to margin collapse and commoditization, much like the internet's effect on media.
As AI makes software development nearly free, traditional engineering moats are disappearing. Businesses must now rely on durable advantages like network effects, economies of scale, brand trust, and defensible IP to survive, becoming "unsloppable."
The cost for a given level of AI capability has decreased by a factor of 100 in just one year. This radical deflation in the price of intelligence requires a complete rethinking of business models and future strategies, as intelligence becomes an abundant, cheap commodity.
Software has long commanded premium valuations due to near-zero marginal distribution costs. AI breaks this model. The significant, variable cost of inference means expenses scale with usage, fundamentally altering software's economic profile and forcing valuations down toward those of traditional industries.
The 50-year supremacy of asset-light software may be an anomaly. If AI makes software creation nearly free, economic value will shift back to the historical mean: tangible assets like infrastructure, energy, and regulated, liability-bearing businesses that touch the physical world.
The common goal of increasing AI model efficiency could have a paradoxical outcome. If AI performance becomes radically cheaper ("too cheap to meter"), it could devalue the massive investments in compute and data center infrastructure, creating a financial crisis for the very companies that enabled the boom.
Unlike traditional SaaS where high switching costs prevent price wars, the AI market faces a unique threat. The portability of prompts and reliance on interchangeable models could enable rapid commoditization. A price war could be "terrifying" and "brutal" for the entire ecosystem, posing a significant downside risk.
Capitalism values scarcity. AI's core disruption is not just automating tasks, but making human-like intellectual labor so abundant that its market value approaches zero. This breaks the fundamental economic loop of trading scarce labor for wages.
The true commercial impact of AI will likely come from small, specialized "micro models" solving boring, high-volume business tasks. While highly valuable, these models are cheap to run and cannot economically justify the current massive capital expenditure on AGI-focused data centers.
Contrary to the 'winner-takes-all' narrative, the rapid pace of innovation in AI is leading to a different outcome. As rival labs quickly match or exceed each other's model capabilities, the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) risk becoming commodities, making it difficult for any single player to justify stratospheric valuations long-term.
