Focusing on successful conversions misses the much larger story. Digging into the reasons for the 85% of rejected leads uncovers systemic issues in targeting, messaging, sales process, and data hygiene, offering a far greater opportunity for funnel improvement than simply optimizing wins.

Instead of focusing solely on conversion rates, measure 'engagement quality'—metrics that signal user confidence, like dwell time, scroll depth, and journey progression. The philosophy is that if you successfully help users understand the content and feel confident, conversions will naturally follow as a positive side effect.

Many marketers equate CRO with just A/B testing. However, a successful program is built on two pillars: research (gathering quantitative and qualitative data) and testing (experimentation). Overlooking the research phase leads to uninformed tests and poor results, as it provides the necessary insights for what to test.

Focusing on a low Cost Per Lead is a common mistake; cheap leads often fail to convert. The more meaningful metric is Customer Acquisition Cost—total marketing spend divided by actual new customers. This shifts focus from lead volume to profitable growth and true campaign effectiveness.

A blended CAC across all channels hides crucial information. By calculating CAC for each individual platform or method (e.g., paid ads, content, outreach), businesses can identify their most efficient channels. This allows them to reallocate budget and effort to the highest-performing areas for more profitable growth.

A motion (e.g., PLG) contributing 20% of revenue might seem successful. However, elite teams analyze its efficiency—the conversion rate and cost to acquire that revenue. A high-cost, low-conversion motion is a significant drain, even if its top-line contribution appears acceptable on paper.

Counterintuitively, removing qualification steps to boost lead volume consistently resulted in less profit. A higher cost to acquire a much higher-value customer ($5k to acquire $45k) is far more profitable than a low cost for a low-value one ($1k to acquire $5k), challenging the focus on CPL over LTV.

When ad performance breaks at scale, the problem isn't your bidding strategy; it's that you've saturated the 3% of the market ready to buy now. To grow, you must target the other 97% with broader, less direct hooks and lead magnets that educate them first.

Don't fear low conversion rates on high-ticket items. The dramatic increase in profit per sale more than compensates for lower volume. This model is not only more profitable on the same number of leads but also significantly reduces operational complexity by requiring fewer customers to serve.