A motion (e.g., PLG) contributing 20% of revenue might seem successful. However, elite teams analyze its efficiency—the conversion rate and cost to acquire that revenue. A high-cost, low-conversion motion is a significant drain, even if its top-line contribution appears acceptable on paper.
Related Insights
A more effective mental model than PLG vs. SLG is analyzing which activities create new demand versus which ones harvest existing demand. Both sales and product can serve either function. Creating demand is always the harder, more critical challenge for any revenue engine.
Most GTM systems track initial outreach and final outcomes but fail to quantify the critical journey in between. This "ginormous gray area" of engagement makes it impossible to understand which activities truly influence pipeline, leading to flawed, outcome-based decision-making instead of journey-based optimization.
Focusing on a low Cost Per Lead is a common mistake; cheap leads often fail to convert. The more meaningful metric is Customer Acquisition Cost—total marketing spend divided by actual new customers. This shifts focus from lead volume to profitable growth and true campaign effectiveness.
A blended CAC across all channels hides crucial information. By calculating CAC for each individual platform or method (e.g., paid ads, content, outreach), businesses can identify their most efficient channels. This allows them to reallocate budget and effort to the highest-performing areas for more profitable growth.
Don't view foundational RevOps work as a chore that distracts from creative marketing. By optimizing conversion rates through better infrastructure, you generate more efficient pipeline and revenue. This, in turn, frees up the budget for the ambitious brand campaigns marketers love to run.
Instead of debating multi-touch attribution, first identify the single, independent event that caused a sales rep to engage a prospect. This "trigger" (e.g., demo request, MQL score) reveals the true efficiency of your GTM motions, which is a more fundamental problem to solve.
Ditch MQLs. For sales-led motions, measure marketing on qualified pipeline (deals converting at >25%). For PLG motions, measure 'activated signups,' where users hit their 'aha moment.' This aligns marketing with quality and revenue, not volume.
Escape the trap of chasing top-line revenue. Instead, make contribution margin (revenue minus COGS, ad spend, and discounts) your primary success metric. This provides a truer picture of business health and aligns the entire organization around profitable, sustainable growth rather than vanity metrics.
Don't fear low conversion rates on high-ticket items. The dramatic increase in profit per sale more than compensates for lower volume. This model is not only more profitable on the same number of leads but also significantly reduces operational complexity by requiring fewer customers to serve.
Sustainable customer acquisition isn't about countless metrics. It boils down to mastering the interplay between three core financial levers: the cost to acquire a customer (CAC), their lifetime gross profit (LTGP), and the time it takes to recoup the initial acquisition cost (Payback Period).
