A separate Integration Management Office (IMO) creates a risky handoff. A better model for agile teams is for the Corp Dev professional who sourced and led the deal to pivot and own the integration plan post-close. This ensures the original deal thesis is carried through execution without loss of context.
Related Insights
When Corp Dev runs diligence and hands it off to integration, it creates information gaps. Having the integration leader run diligence provides irreplaceable firsthand context, preventing misinterpretations and avoiding the need to 're-diligence' the deal later.
Combining strategy, M&A, and integration under a single leader provides a full lifecycle, enterprise-wide view. This structure breaks down silos and creates a "closed-loop system" where post-deal integration performance and lessons learned directly feed back into future strategy and deal theses, refining success metrics beyond financials.
Instead of a separate team handing off findings, Cisco's integration lead orchestrates the entire diligence process. This ensures that diligence is not just a risk-finding exercise but is actively focused on validating the executability of the initial integration strategy and deal thesis.
Cisco's model brings the integration lead in from the earliest phases to shape diligence strategy. This ensures the "how" of integration is validated early, preventing post-close surprises and accelerating value capture, a stark contrast to the traditional model where integration is a late-stage handover.
To avoid a broken handoff, embed key business and integration experts into the core deal team from the start. These members view diligence through an integration lens, validating synergy assumptions and timelines in real-time. This prevents post-signing surprises and ensures the deal model is operationally achievable, creating a seamless transition from deal-making to execution.
The biggest risk after closing a deal is losing momentum. To ensure success, Snowflake assigns a 'Directly Responsible Individual' (DRI) for integration. This person leads reviews at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days post-close to hold everyone accountable to the integration plan and original thesis.
To avoid post-close surprises and knowledge loss, marry diligence and integration leads before an LOI is even signed. This ensures real-world operational experience informs diligence from the start. The goal is to have a drafted integration thesis by LOI and a near-complete plan by signing, not after closing.
Corporate Development facilitates M&A but should not be the "sponsor." The true sponsor is the internal leader from product or engineering who will own the acquisition's success post-close. This distinction ensures clear accountability and prevents deals that lack a dedicated internal champion.
To prevent knowledge gaps between deal execution and integration, IFS makes the same internal expert responsible for a specific workstream (e.g., product, GTM) during commercial diligence and the subsequent integration phase, creating end-to-end accountability.
A process where the deal team hands off a signed transaction to a separate integration team is flawed. State Street integrates business and integration experts into the deal team from the start. This ensures diligence is informed by integration realities, timelines are realistic, and synergy assumptions in the deal model are achievable.