Contrary to the popular belief that failing to adopt AI is the biggest risk, some companies may be harming their value by developing AI practices too quickly. The market and client needs may not be ready for advanced AI integration, leading to a misallocation of resources and slower-than-expected returns.

Many AI implementation projects are being paused or canceled due to a lack of immediate ROI. This reflects Amara's Law: we overestimate technology in the short term and underestimate it long term. Leaders must treat AI as a long-term strategic investment, not a short-term magic bullet.

A 2022 study by the Forecasting Research Institute has been reviewed, revealing that top forecasters and AI experts significantly underestimated AI advancements. They assigned single-digit odds to breakthroughs that occurred within two years, proving we are consistently behind the curve in our predictions.

Julian Schrittwieser, a key researcher from Anthropic and formerly Google DeepMind, forecasts that extrapolating current AI progress suggests models will achieve full-day autonomy and match human experts across many industries by mid-2026. This timeline is much shorter than many anticipate.

The advancement of AI is not linear. While the industry anticipated a "year of agents" for practical assistance, the most significant recent progress has been in specialized, academic fields like competitive mathematics. This highlights the unpredictable nature of AI development.

With past shifts like the internet or mobile, we understood the physical constraints (e.g., modem speeds, battery life). With generative AI, we lack a theoretical understanding of its scaling potential, making it impossible to forecast its ultimate capabilities beyond "vibes-based" guesses from experts.

Despite rapid software advances like deep learning, the deployment of self-driving cars was a 20-year process because it had to integrate with the mature automotive industry's supply chains, infrastructure, and business models. This serves as a reminder that AI's real-world impact is often constrained by the readiness of the sectors it aims to disrupt.

Many technical leaders initially dismissed generative AI for its failures on simple logical tasks. However, its rapid, tangible improvement over a short period forces a re-evaluation and a crucial mindset shift towards adoption to avoid being left behind.

For investors and builders, the key variable isn't the final market penetration of AI. It's the timeline. A 3-year adoption curve requires a vastly different strategy, team, and funding model than a 30-year one, making speed the most critical metric for strategic planning.