According to Dan Sundheim, European markets exhibit a significant lag in pricing successful corporate turnarounds compared to the U.S. This "voting machine" is slower, as investors who have been burned by a company's historical underperformance remain skeptical long after a new strategy shows clear signs of working.

Related Insights

With information now ubiquitous, the primary source of market inefficiency is no longer informational but behavioral. The most durable edge is "time arbitrage"—exploiting the market's obsession with short-term results by focusing on a business's normalized potential over a two-to-four-year horizon.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the massive flow of capital into passive indexes and short-term systematic strategies has reduced the number of actors focused on long-term fundamentals. This creates price dislocations and volatility, offering alpha for patient investors.

Investment gains often come from "multiple expansion," where the market's perception of a business improves, causing it to trade at a higher valuation. This sentiment shift is frequently more impactful than pure earnings growth, and underestimating it is a primary reason for selling winning stocks too early.

Europe's path to economic growth may be easier than America's precisely because it's starting from a lower base. It's easier for a '1.5 GPA student' to improve to a 2.5 than for a '3.6 GPA student' to reach a 4.0. With strong universities and talent, Europe has the assets to make significant gains by fixing fundamental issues.

The modern market is driven by short-term incentives, with hedge funds and pod shops trading based on quarterly estimates. This creates volatility and mispricing. An investor who can withstand short-term underperformance and maintain a multi-year view can exploit these structural inefficiencies.

Contrary to classic theory, markets may be growing less efficient. This is driven not only by passive indexing but also by a structural shift in active management towards short-term, quantitative strategies that prioritize immediate price movements over long-term fundamental value.

A persistent headwind for European markets is the dual impact of rising Chinese competition and weak demand from China. For the past several years, this single factor has been responsible for a staggering 60% to 90% of all earnings downgrades across the European index, particularly hitting sectors like chemicals and autos.

After nearly two decades of poor performance, European banks have become a compelling deep value opportunity. Pilecki highlights French banks trading at just 35-60% of tangible book value, viewing new CEO appointments as a key catalyst for a potential re-rating in the long-hated sector.

Historical analysis of investors like Ben Graham and Charlie Munger reveals a consistent pattern: significant, multi-year periods of lagging the market are not an anomaly but a necessary part of a successful long-term strategy. This reality demands structuring your firm and mindset for inevitable pain.

Morgan Stanley's 2026 outlook suggests a strong US market will create a "slipstream" effect, lifting European equities. This uplift will come from valuation multiple expansion, not strong local earnings, as investors anticipate Europe will eventually benefit from the broadening US economic recovery.