Contrary to classic theory, markets may be growing less efficient. This is driven not only by passive indexing but also by a structural shift in active management towards short-term, quantitative strategies that prioritize immediate price movements over long-term fundamental value.
Related Insights
Contrary to popular belief, the market may be getting less efficient. The dominance of indexing, quant funds, and multi-manager pods—all with short time horizons—creates dislocations. This leaves opportunities for long-term investors to buy valuable assets that are neglected because their path to value creation is uncertain.
Active management is more viable in emerging markets than in the US. The largest EM ETF (EEM) has a high 0.72% expense ratio, the universe of stocks is twice as large as the US, and analyst coverage is sparse. This creates significant opportunities for skilled stock pickers to outperform passive strategies.
The market is a 'Player vs. Player vs. Environment' game where retail investors play against pros trying to take their money (PvP) amid unpredictable global events (PvE). The only reliable winning strategy for the average person is to refuse to play the short-term PvP game and instead invest long-term.
Contrary to the belief that mega-cap stocks are efficiently priced, behemoths like Alphabet can see 100% price swings in a single year. This volatility creates massive opportunities for patient investors who ignore market noise and focus on fundamentals.
The underperformance of active managers in the last decade wasn't just due to the rise of indexing. The historic run of a few mega-cap tech stocks created a market-cap-weighted index that was statistically almost impossible to beat without owning those specific names, leading to lower active share and alpha dispersion.
Contrary to the belief that indexing creates market inefficiencies, Michael Mauboussin argues the opposite. Indexing removes the weakest, 'closet indexing' players from the active pool, increasing the average skill level of the remaining competition and making it harder to find an edge.
The most important market shift isn't passive investing; it's the rise of retail traders using low-cost platforms and short-term options. This creates powerful feedback loops as market makers hedge their positions, leading to massive, fundamentals-defying stock swings of 20% or more in a single day.
The dominance of passive funds and hyper-short-term pod shops has doubled the average stock price movement in the REIT space. This increased volatility creates opportunities for long-term investors to capitalize on exaggerated market reactions to minor news.
The era of constant central bank intervention has rendered traditional value investing irrelevant. Market movements are now dictated by liquidity and stimulus flows, not by fundamental analysis of a company's intrinsic value. Investors must now track the 'liquidity impulse' to succeed.
In a market dominated by short-term traders and passive indexers, companies crave long-duration shareholders. Firms that hold positions for 5-10 years and focus on long-term strategy gain a competitive edge through better access to management, as companies are incentivized to engage with stable partners over transient capital.