To compete with Chinese EV maker BYD, CEO Jim Farley concluded his existing team and processes were inadequate. He formed an independent group with new talent, separate IT systems, and a different philosophy to radically simplify vehicle design and manufacturing.

While the loss of the tax credit will hurt sales short-term, it also removes the "government mandate" attack line used by politicians. This forces EVs to be judged as just another car, allowing them to compete on their own merits like lower operating costs and better performance.

With a key government subsidy gone, Tesla is using a rental model as a 'try-before-you-buy' tactic. This shift indicates EV companies must now rely on creative sales funnels and direct product experience, rather than financial incentives, to convert hesitant customers.

Despite devising a clever, IRS-approved leasing scheme to extend EV credits, both companies immediately abandoned the plan after a few senators threatened an investigation. This rapid reversal highlights the auto industry's extreme sensitivity to political pressure, even when legally in the clear.

While maintaining EVs as its long-term 'North Star,' GM is pragmatically adjusting to slowing EV adoption and regulatory shifts. CEO Mary Barra acknowledges the need to 'meet the customer where they are,' indicating that the profitable internal combustion engine (ICE) business is crucial for funding the transition and maintaining stability through market volatility.

The credit's requirements for North American manufacturing and sourcing from trade partners were designed to counter China's dominance in the EV supply chain. Its elimination undermines this strategic goal, leaving tariffs as the primary, less effective tool.

The belief that consumers needed electric versions of familiar gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs led to EVs that were too big, heavy, and expensive. The market is now forcing a pullback from this strategy towards smaller, more efficient, and profitable designs.

Conceding that competitor BYD has a cost advantage from vertically integrated battery production, Ford's CEO revealed a counter-strategy: designing motors and gearboxes so efficient they require 30% less battery capacity to achieve the same range, thereby bypassing the core battery cost problem.

Unlike competitors creating isolated 'skunkworks' teams for EV development, GM pursues a steady, integrated approach. The company believes this avoids the 'ingestion risk' of bringing a radical project back into the main organization, allowing innovations in battery tech and architecture to scale more quickly and efficiently across its massive global portfolio.