For a controversial strategic shift, a co-founder's "moral authority" is invaluable. They can absorb the risk of looking foolish and give up their responsibilities ("Legos") to spearhead a new initiative. This allows them to champion a new direction with a level of credibility that can overcome internal skepticism.

When conducting manual "open coding" for AI evals, teams often get bogged down by trying to reach a consensus. Instead, appoint a single person with deep domain expertise (often the product manager) to be the "benevolent dictator," making the final judgment calls on error categorization. This makes the process tractable and fast.

Founders often mistake their preferences for principles. A true principle is a non-negotiable rule you adhere to regardless of the trade-offs (e.g., 'always do things the right way'). A preference is a desired path you're willing to abandon when circumstances change (e.g., 'prefer not to build a sales team yet'). Clarifying this distinction leads to more consistent and high-integrity decisions.

The long-standing relationship between PhonePe's co-founders, built on deep trust, allows them to be interchangeable in their roles. This enables one to step back during difficult periods while the other steps in, ensuring resilience through crises.

Some CEOs encourage tension between sales and marketing. A more effective model is for the CRO and CMO to build enough trust to handle all disagreements—like lead quality or follow-up—behind closed doors. This prevents a culture of finger-pointing and presents a united front to leadership.

At Crisp.ai, the core value is that the best argument always wins, regardless of who it comes from—a new junior employee or the company founder. This approach flattens hierarchy and ensures that the best ideas, which often originate from those closest to the product and customers (engineers, PMs), are prioritized.

Unlike committees, where partners might "sell" each other on a deal, a single decision-maker model tests true conviction. If a General Partner proceeds with an investment despite negative feedback from the partnership, it demonstrates their unwavering belief, leading to more intellectually honest decisions.

Counteract the tendency for the highest-paid person's opinion (HIPPO) to dominate decisions. Position all stakeholder ideas, regardless of seniority, as valid hypotheses to be tested. This makes objective data, not job titles, the ultimate arbiter for website changes, fostering a more effective culture.

Sequoia's internal data shows consensus is irrelevant to investment success. A deal with strong advocates (voting '9') and strong detractors (voting '1') is preferable to one where everyone is mildly positive (a '6'). The presence of passionate conviction, even amid dissent, is the critical signal for pursuing outlier returns.