The concept of a vast 'mating marketplace' driven by immediate value signals is a recent phenomenon. Evolutionarily, humans formed bonds based on long-term compatibility within small, familiar tribes, suggesting that today's dating apps create an unnatural and potentially detrimental dynamic.

Deep connection relies on a shared “fun age”—a mutual understanding of what constitutes play and enjoyment. Whether it’s childlike pranks or quiet domesticity, having compatible fun ages allows partners to cultivate both levity and gravity, which is essential for long-term relational health.

Contrary to romantic narratives, men's decisions to commit are driven by a list of practical, factual criteria like compatible values, shared future direction, and productive communication. While important, feelings of 'love and connection' are not the primary factors that make someone the right person to marry.

Intense, chaotic, or euphoric feelings in a new relationship are often misinterpreted as deep "chemistry" or love. In reality, this intensity can be a sign that one's nervous system recognizes a familiar, and potentially unhealthy, dynamic from the past. True, safe intimacy is often calmer and less dramatic.

With endless dating options, the goal isn't to get a second date with everyone, but to find a compatible partner fast. The optimal strategy is to ask controversial or 'off-putting' questions early to screen for values, even if it means fewer callbacks.

Women value traits like kindness, safety, and love, but these qualities are desired in partners they are already attracted to. Men often mistakenly believe that simply being nicer will create attraction, when in fact attraction must be established first through other means. The positive traits are a requirement for a relationship, not a catalyst for initial desire.

Relationships don't start in earnest until the initial fantasy shatters. This 'crisis of disappointment' happens when partners see each other realistically for the first time, flaws and all. Only after this moment can a genuine connection be built on who the person actually is, rather than on an idealized projection.

In a world hyper-optimized for convenience and efficiency, true romance is a disruptive force. It defies schedules, logic, and productivity. If a relationship fits perfectly into a pre-planned life without causing any friction or spontaneity, it may be lacking the essential, inconvenient spark of passion.

The success of a long-term relationship is better predicted by how partners handle conflict and disagreement than by how much they enjoy good times together. People are more likely to break up due to poor conflict resolution than a lack of peak experiences.