To recruit elite talent capable of running major corporations into public service, the UAE government pays its ministers salaries comparable to the private sector. The rationale is simple: if you want the best talent, you must compete for it financially. As they say, "if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys."

The Pendleton Act of 1883 is often seen as the origin of the modern civil service. However, the true measure of a bureaucracy's effectiveness is the competency of its people. The laws are secondary to whether agencies can successfully recruit and empower experts who can actually perform their jobs well.

Citing economist Ed Glaeser's 'capacity eats policy for a light snack,' the core argument is that the government's ability to execute—having the right people with the right skills—is a far greater determinant of success than the policy itself. Lacking execution capacity dooms even the best-laid plans.

To combat corruption, the US should consider Singapore's model: pay elected officials significantly higher salaries (e.g., $1-2 million) but enforce absolute zero tolerance for insider trading or lobbying conflicts. This approach professionalizes public service and removes the financial incentive for illicit activities.

To compete with high private sector salaries, the U.S. Tech Force frames its roles as a service to the country, akin to the Peace Corps. This reframes the value proposition away from pure compensation and towards civic duty and resume prestige, making it more appealing to mission-driven talent who might otherwise not consider public sector work.

The federal government's rigid GS pay schedule traditionally links compensation to degrees and years of experience, barring skilled but non-traditionally qualified individuals from senior roles. The OPM is now eliminating these requirements to enable a merit-based system where skill, not credentials, dictates pay and position.

High-achievers from the private sector are drawn to government service by missions with tangible impact and the resources to execute. The CHIPS program's success in recruiting was tied directly to its significant funding and clear mandate, which is far more compelling than a purely analytical or advisory role.

Singapore's economic success is credited to its founding leaders' decision to attract and retain top-tier talent in the civil service and politics with high compensation. This creates a highly competent bureaucracy capable of sophisticated, long-term policy planning that enables a thriving business environment.

Singapore's prosperity is attributed to its founding leaders' decision to create a highly-paid, highly-educated, and hard-working civil service. This ensures top-notch talent formulates long-term policies that allow businesses to thrive, which is seen as crucial for guaranteeing the country's success over a multi-decade horizon for its citizens.