A major hidden cost in carve-outs is vendor contract renegotiation, as change-of-control clauses can trigger price hikes. State Street mitigates this by stating in its LOI that the valuation assumes all third-party contracts remain at or near historical costs. This forces the issue early and protects the buyer's valuation model.
Related Insights
When a buyer insists on a "termination for convenience" clause, explain that it nullifies the "length of commitment" lever. This effectively changes a multi-year agreement into a month-to-month one, which logically carries a much higher price (e.g., a 30-35% increase). This frames the clause not as a legal term, but a commercial one with a clear cost.
For complex legal requests that increase your business risk or costs (e.g., unlimited liability, extensive insurance requirements), treat them as an additional negotiation lever. Explain that your standard pricing is based on a reasonable, collaborative risk profile. Accepting their terms changes that profile and will require adjusting the price accordingly.
By proactively asking about potential deal-killers like budget or partner approval early in the sales process, you transform them from adversarial objections into collaborative obstacles. This disarms the buyer's defensiveness and makes them easier to solve together, preventing them from being used as excuses later.
Effective negotiation avoids getting bogged down in details initially. Instead, focus on reaching a high-level agreement on five key pillars: valuation, capital structure, governance, strategy, and exit plan. Only after this framework is set should you dive into the details.
To avoid post-close surprises and knowledge loss, marry diligence and integration leads before an LOI is even signed. This ensures real-world operational experience informs diligence from the start. The goal is to have a drafted integration thesis by LOI and a near-complete plan by signing, not after closing.
When sourcing a carve-out proactively, the seller may not be fully committed. State Street recommends the seller commission a sell-side Quality of Earnings (QofE) report. Their willingness to invest in this serves as a strong signal of their seriousness and provides a more accurate financial baseline, reducing the risk of surprises during diligence.
State Street's Keith Crawford identifies three primary reasons to walk away from a carve-out. First is an uncertain perimeter—not knowing exactly what assets you're buying. Second is ambiguity around which employees are in scope. Third is discovering you cannot perform the core service on day one due to a missed dependency.
A process where the deal team hands off a signed transaction to a separate integration team is flawed. State Street integrates business and integration experts into the deal team from the start. This ensures diligence is informed by integration realities, timelines are realistic, and synergy assumptions in the deal model are achievable.
Experienced acquirers use templates for carve-outs, but it's a misconception they are fully scalable. Keith Crawford of State Street cautions that the final 20%—a company's unique operational setup and internal processes—requires custom analysis to avoid relying on past assumptions and missing deal-specific risks.
Instead of hiding price until the end of the sales cycle, be transparent from the start. Acknowledge if your solution is at the high end of the market and provide a realistic price range based on their environment. This allows you to quickly qualify out buyers with misaligned budgets, saving your most valuable asset: time.