Despite multiple clinical trials, adding checkpoint inhibitors to frontline therapy for ovarian cancer has not demonstrated a proven survival benefit. The role of immunotherapy in this setting remains confined to rare subsets like DMMR or TMB-high tumors, and it is not standard practice for the general population.

Unlike rectal cancer where MRI aids response assessment, MSI-high colon cancer lacks a reliable imaging modality to confirm a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This makes a "watch and wait" approach far more challenging and not currently recommended outside of a clinical trial.

Experts favor a Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NIVO+EP) combination for newly diagnosed, MSI-high, stage IV gastroesophageal cancer patients who can tolerate it. This approach avoids chemotherapy and yields high, sustained response rates, including potential for complete pathologic responses in metastatic settings.

An individual tumor can have hundreds of unique mutations, making it impossible to predict treatment response from a single genetic marker. This molecular chaos necessitates functional tests that measure a drug's actual effect on the patient's cells to determine the best therapy.

Both experts advocate shifting immune cell engager use from late-stage, high-burden cancer to a minimal residual disease (MRD) setting. Treating a low tumor load maximizes the effector-to-target ratio, enhances efficacy, and significantly reduces side effects, potentially moving these therapies to first-line combinations.

In the increasingly common scenario of gastric cancer with multiple biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, Claudin), experts recommend a clear hierarchy. Based on data maturity, HER2-targeted therapy is the first choice, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-targeted therapy third.

Unlike breast or lung cancer where a biomarker's effectiveness persists across treatment stages, biomarkers in upper GI cancers often fail to show similar efficacy when moved from one line of therapy to another. This suggests a more variable and rapidly changing tumor biology.

Retrospective data suggests patients with MSI-high rectal cancer might not just respond poorly to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation (TNT), but their disease could actually progress. This makes immunotherapy a potentially safer and more effective first-line neoadjuvant choice, not just an alternative.

The standard approach for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer is obsolete. Clinicians must test for and categorize patients into at least four, soon five, distinct biomarker-defined subgroups (MSI-high, BRAF V600E, RAS/RAF wild-type, HER2-positive, and the RAS-mutated "catch-all") to select the optimal initial therapy.