For ovarian cancer patients with limited, or oligometastatic, disease, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a valuable and low-toxicity option. A key advantage is that it can be administered to symptomatic areas without delaying or interrupting the patient's crucial systemic therapy regimen.
Mirroring success in rectal cancer, a new trial is exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized, MSI-high endometrial cancer. This strategy could potentially allow patients to avoid surgery and radiation, which is a particularly compelling option for those who wish to preserve their fertility.
While patients increasingly ask about ctDNA, clinicians are hesitant to use it for treatment decisions in ovarian cancer management. A rising ctDNA level may prompt more vigilant surveillance but does not yet trigger treatment initiation, as its correlation with survival outcomes is unproven.
The selection between PARP inhibitors like olaparib and niraparib is not one-size-fits-all. It's a personalized decision based on patient preference for dosing frequency (once vs. twice daily), tolerance for side effects like hypertension, and potential drug-drug interactions.
Despite multiple clinical trials, adding checkpoint inhibitors to frontline therapy for ovarian cancer has not demonstrated a proven survival benefit. The role of immunotherapy in this setting remains confined to rare subsets like DMMR or TMB-high tumors, and it is not standard practice for the general population.
Although HER2 expression is rare in cervical cancer, it is a crucial biomarker to test for. In these uncommon cases, patients who have progressed on standard immunotherapy can achieve "wonderful responses" with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), highlighting a powerful, targeted option for a population with high unmet need.
Despite the KEYNOTE-B96 trial showing a statistically significant survival benefit, the expert's enthusiasm for adding pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is only "neutral." This hesitation stems from challenges in sequencing it with other effective therapies and uncertainty about which patient subgroups truly benefit.
The risk of developing myeloid neoplasms from PARP inhibitors in the frontline ovarian cancer setting is very low, around 1%. However, it is critical to adhere to the recommended 2-3 year treatment duration and then stop the therapy to avoid unnecessary long-term risk.
The treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has rapidly evolved into a biomarker-driven paradigm. Clinicians must now test for and choose between therapies targeting distinct markers like folate receptor alpha (mirvetuximab), HER2 (T-DXd), and PD-L1 (pembrolizumab), requiring a sophisticated sequencing strategy.
When planning treatment for patients who will receive multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), the prevailing clinical strategy is to focus on alternating the drug's payload (e.g., a tubulin inhibitor vs. a topoisomerase I inhibitor). This approach is believed to be more effective at overcoming resistance than alternating the cell-surface target.
Disparate clinical trial results in endometrial cancer suggest a mechanistic difference between immunotherapy targets. PD-1 inhibitors (dostarlimab, pembrolizumab) have shown pronounced responses, whereas the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab did not, indicating that targeting the PD-1 receptor may be a more robust strategy in GYN cancers.