With 65% of today's winning companies being less than three years old, VCs are focusing their attention on these newer, high-growth AI startups. Older, non-rocketship portfolio companies are being ignored, a stark shift from previous cycles where investors would try to fix them.
Related Insights
A market bifurcation is underway where investors prioritize AI startups with extreme growth rates over traditional SaaS companies. This creates a "changing of the guard," forcing established SaaS players to adopt AI aggressively or risk being devalued as legacy assets, while AI-native firms command premium valuations.
Similar to the dot-com era, the current AI investment cycle is expected to produce a high number of company failures alongside a few generational winners that create more value than ever before in venture capital history.
The current fundraising environment is the most binary in recent memory. Startups with the "right" narrative—AI-native, elite incubator pedigree, explosive growth—get funded easily. Companies with solid but non-hype metrics, like classic SaaS growers, are finding it nearly impossible to raise capital. The middle market has vanished.
Redpoint Ventures' Erica Brescia describes a shift in their investment thesis for the AI era. They are now more likely to back young, "high-velocity" founders who "run through walls to win" over those with traditional domain expertise. Sheer speed, storytelling, and determination are becoming more critical selection criteria.
According to investor sentiment, the window for startups to pivot to AI has closed. If a company doesn't have a disruptive AI offering in the market, venture capitalists have likely 'lost hope' and written them off, believing they lack the necessary speed to compete.
The focus on AI among institutional investors is so absolute that promising non-AI companies risk "dying of neglect" and being unable to secure follow-on funding. This creates a potential opportunity gap for angel investors to fund valuable businesses in overlooked sectors.
Aggregate venture capital investment figures are misleading. The market is becoming bimodal: a handful of elite AI companies absorb a disproportionate share of capital, while the vast majority of other startups, including 900+ unicorns, face a tougher fundraising and exit environment.
AI companies raise subsequent rounds so quickly that little is de-risked between seed and Series B, yet valuations skyrocket. This dynamic forces large funds, which traditionally wait for traction, to compete at the earliest inception stage to secure a stake before prices become untenable for the risk involved.
In the AI era, technology moats are shrinking as tools become commoditized. Consequently, early-stage investors increasingly prioritize the founding team itself, specifically their execution velocity and ability to leverage AI, over any specific technical advantage.
During major tech shifts like AI, founder-led growth-stage companies hold a unique advantage. They possess the resources, customer relationships, and product-market fit that new startups lack, while retaining the agility and founder-driven vision that large incumbents have often lost. This combination makes them the most likely winners in emerging AI-native markets.