Official median wage data only tracks full-time employees, completely removing laid-off, low-wage workers from the calculation. This creates a distorted reality where median wages can appear to rise during economic downturns, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, precisely because the lowest earners have lost their jobs and their data is deleted.
Related Insights
Government unemployment statistics are misleading because they count anyone working even one hour a week as 'employed.' A more accurate measure reveals that nearly a quarter of American workers are functionally unemployed, meaning they work for poverty-level wages or can't find full-time work despite wanting it.
Inaccurate headline statistics are not just academic; they actively shape policy. The misleading Consumer Price Index (CPI), for example, is used to determine Social Security benefits, food assistance eligibility, and state-level minimum wages. This means policy decisions are based on a distorted view of economic reality, leading to ineffective outcomes.
While headline unemployment remains low, a subtle weakening is occurring through "job downgrading." Workers, particularly in warehouse and retail, are not being laid off but are seeing their weekly hours cut from 40-50 to 30-35. This loss of hours and overtime pay erodes their income and bargaining power without being reflected in official unemployment statistics.
The official unemployment rate is misleadingly low because when disgruntled workers give up looking for a job, they exit the labor force and are no longer counted as 'unemployed.' This artificially improves the headline number while masking underlying economic weakness and anger among young job seekers.
Laid-off workers are increasingly turning to gig platforms like Uber instead of filing for unemployment. This trend artificially suppresses unemployment insurance (UI) claims, making this historically reliable indicator less effective at signaling rising joblessness and the true state of the labor market.
Despite headline economic growth, the bottom 80% of U.S. households have seen their spending power stagnate since before the pandemic. Their spending has grown at exactly the rate of inflation, meaning their real consumption hasn't increased. This data explains the widespread public dissatisfaction with the economy.
ADP data reveals a divergence in the labor market: firms with 1-49 employees saw a -0.3% year-over-year decline in jobs. In contrast, large firms experienced 3.7% growth. This indicates that economic pressures and uncertainty are disproportionately impacting small businesses, forcing them to lay off staff.
A disconnect exists between high layoff announcements and record-low UI claims. This may be because laid-off white-collar workers receive severance, delaying their UI eligibility, and struggling self-employed small business owners aren't eligible for unemployment insurance at all.
Large, negative revisions to economic data often occur around major economic turning points. This is because companies hit first by a downturn are more likely to delay reporting their data, which makes the initial economic reports appear stronger than reality.
During government data blackouts, economists can approximate the official BLS payroll survey with high accuracy. An average of private payroll data from ADP and Revealio Labs has shown a 95% correlation with the government's numbers over the past five years, suggesting underlying job growth is near zero.